CHATTANOOGA, Tenn.
The Emory University men’s tennis team won the first four completed singles matches to rally past Bowdoin, 5-2, in the semifinals of the NCAA Division III Championship on Tuesday evening.
The loss ended Bowdoin’s (21-5) hopes of a repeat national championship.
Emory advances to play Claremont Mudd Scripps in the NCAA title match today.
The teams split the first two completed doubles matches with Bowdoin earning a win at No. 2 from Kyle Wolfe and Jerry Jiang (8-5) while Emory claimed the No. 1 position thanks to Scott Rubinstein and James Spaulding, 8-5.
The No. 3 doubles match went to a tiebreak where the Polar Bear duo of Gil Roddy and Justin Patel earned a 9-8 (7-4) win to give Bowdoin a 2- 1 edge heading to singles.
The Eagles came out firing in singles play, getting straight-set wins at No. 1 from Aman Manji, No. 6 Rubenstein and No. 3 Adrian Bouchet to take a 4-2 advantage.
With the three remaining matches in third sets, Jonathan Jemison earned a late break against Grant Urken at No. 2 singles and held serve to claim the match-clinching 6-3, 6-7, 6-4 win.
The victory is a measure of revenge for the Eagles, who lost to the Polar Bears in the NCAA semifinals a year ago, 5-4.
Bowdoin’s doubles pairing of Luke Tercek and Urken will compete in the NCAA Individual championship that begins on Thursday. Pairings will be announced today.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less