BINGHAMPTON, NY — The Portland Sea Dogs (24-28) split a doubleheader with the Binghamton Rumble Ponies (31-20) on Saturday night, dropping the opener 5-1, but rebounding for a 2-0 win in the nightcap.
Game 1 recap
Binghamton scored four times in the first inning and never looked back, beating the Sea Dogs 5-1. RHP Seth Lugo (1-1) on a MLB Rehab Assignment from the New York Mets, earned the win for Binghamton.
Travis Lakins (L, 0-3) suffered the loss for Portland, giving up 10 hits and 5 runs over 4 plus innings.
Trailing 5-0 in the fourth inning, Rafael Devers (2-for-3) hit a long homer to left field, his 10th of the season, but his sixth with two strikes.
Tomas Nido ignited the scoring for the Rumble Ponies, hitting a two-run homer (No. 4) in the first. Gustavo Nunez capped off the four-run frame with a two-run single. David Thompson nailed a two-out RBI double in the second.
Lefty Bobby Poyner made his Double-A debut for Portland and retired all six batters, picking up four strikeouts.
Game 2 recap
Jacob Dahlstrand (4-1) worked five scoreless innings and Jeremy Barfield hit a two-run homer (No. 4) in the sixth, leading the Sea Dogs to a 2-0 win over the Rumble Ponies in the nightcap.
Dahlstrand scattered four hits, three walks and two strikeouts, earning his fourth win of the season. Josh Smith pitched the final two innings for his first save in the Red Sox system.
Barfield hit his fourth homer in just 44 at-bats since joining the Sea Dogs from the Sugar Land Skeeters.
Josh Tobias went 2-for-3 and Mike Olt walked three times.
Portland and Binghamton wrap-up their four-game series on Sunday afternoon with a 1:05 PM first pitch at NYSEG Stadium. Portland does not have their starter listed for Sunday, the Rumble Ponies have RHP Donovan Hand (3-1, 3.02) on the hill.
Listen live on the U.S. Cellular Sea Dogs Radio Network beginning at 12:50.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less