BATH
A settlement has been reached between Bath Iron Works and a former employee who claimed he was discriminated against by the shipyard.
Brian Bennett of Bath had alleged that the shipyard, where he worked from 2008 to 2016, discriminated against him by firing him instead of providing him with reasonable accommodation after he took about two months of medical leave for mental health reasons.
When he returned to work in March 2016, Bennett claimed he was called into a meeting where he was accused of fraud because he still coached high school basketball while on leave from work. His doctor, he said, had recommended he continue to coach the team for continuity and to get him outside of his home. According to the lawsuit, BIW said he had abandoned his job and was guilty of fraud.
Bennett provided access to medical records and a letter from his psychiatrist who explained that he should continue coaching for therapeutic reasons. Bennett filed a com- plaint with the Maine Human Rights Commission alleging discrimination, and BIW received the notice on June 27. The MHRC issued a right to sue notice.
Three days later, BIW claimed Bennett didn’t provide justification for his absence from work during his leave, and he was fired in July 2016.
Bennett filed the suit in February. He is represented by Chad Hansen of the Maine Employee Rights Group.
The terms of the settlement are not part of the public record, but the notice was filed on Oct. 6.
Attempts to reach attorneys involved in the matter were unsuccessful. However, in court filings, Ernest Babcock, attorney for BIW, denies any wrongdoing.
Nearly 6,000 people work at BIW, the region’s largest employer.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less