A federal heating aid program for low-income residents has survived another attempt by President Donald Trump to kill it.
The $1.3 trillion spending bill signed by Trump on Friday includes $3.64 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
The energy assistance funding includes an extra $250 million, the first increase in five years.
“It’s amazing, isn’t it?” said Mark Wolfe, director of the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association in Washington, D.C. “Not only did Congress reject the president’s proposal but they increased our funding. This will significantly help poor people.”
The program is especially important in the Northeast, where states are more reliant on heating oil to keep their homes warm in the winter.
It was the second time Trump tried to kill the program. He contends it’s unnecessary and rife with fraud, but program supporters say he’s wrong on both counts. They say the program known as LIHEAP is a lifeline for the elderly, disabled and others on fixed incomes.
Trump said states have programs to prevent utility shut-offs in cold weather, but there’s no such requirement for heating oil dealers, which are not regulated like electric and natural gas utilities, to deliver to customers who cannot pay.
U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, had called Trump’s efforts to gut the program “dangerous and unacceptable.”
“The past few weeks of storms have demonstrated that heating assistance is an absolute necessity,” she said.
All told, the program has served about 6 million households in recent years, and the extra funding is enough to serve another 500,000 households, Wolfe said. In addition to helping people stay warm, the program helps people stay cool in the blazing summer heat of states like Florida and Arizona.
The Times Record Sustaining Sponsor
We believe a community must be informed to thrive. bowdoin.edu
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less