
The five member Senate Standing Committee on Conduct and Ethics panel, comprised of Republican Sens. David Burns, Brian Langley and Roger Katz and Democratic Sens. Anne Haskell of Cumberland and Linda Valentino of Saco voted 4-1 to clear Collins, with Haskell casting the dissenting vote.
“This is a huge relief, to say the least, said Collins. “I knew all along that I had done nothing wrong, but to have my integrity called into question by my Democrat colleagues was extremely troubling and hurtful.”
Collins called the accusation Monday by Senate Democratic Leader Justin Alfond and Sen. John Patrick, “ a desperate, last-minute political stunt.”
“I understand that the Democrats are dissatisfied with being in the minority, but to engage in this type of mud-slinging is beneath this institution and those elected to serve the people of Maine,” Collins said in a statement.
Collins, who is seeking his fourth term representing District 34, came under fire Monday by Patrick and Alfond or using $2,400 in leftover 2014 campaign funds to pre-pay lodging expenses for the Legislative session that began in January 2015 – and then sought and received travel and lodging reimbursement from the Legislature. They leveled similar charges against Sen. Andre Cushing of Newport.
Senate District 34 includes Acton, Kennebunk, Lebanon, North Berwick, Wells and part of Berwick.
Collins is a member of the senate ethics panel; he recused himself in this case. Sen. President Michael Thibodeau temporarily appointed Republican Sen. Roger Katz.
— Senior Staff Writer Tammy Wells can be contacted at 324-4444 (local call in Sanford) or 282-1535, ext. 327 or [email protected]
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less