
It was all downhill from there for Biddeford as the Westbrook running attack began to click.
Just two minutes into the second, Loureiro marched 33 yards down the field, breaking three tackles to put the Blue Blazes up 14-6. Less than five minutes later, Loureiro took a reverse in for another score, this time for 30 yards.
Meanwhile, the Tigers failed to score and were held to just 58 yards in the quarter.
Westbrook’s run game cooled off a bit in the third, so Sawyer began to let it fly, hitting receiver Bailey Ryan for a 44-yard touchdown pass at the 7:53 mark.
The Tigers still showed signs of life, with Curit hitting Rhoy with a 63-yard tocuhdown pass just 26 seconds later, pulling them within two scores.
Westbrook’s defense dominated the game, totaling four sacks and two fumble recoveries, one coming late in the third that essentially ended any hope the Tigers had.
In the final minute of the third, Curit dropped back to pass and was hit hard from behind. As the ball hit the ground, Hutchins scooped it up and returned the fumble 85 yards for the score – putting Westbrook up 33-13 going into the fourth.
Coach Curit gave credit to Westbrook’s attack, and admitted his own team’s struggles.
“I’ll have to go back and watch the tape to see what went wrong specifically, but I know our offensive line really struggled against them all night,” said Curit.
Westbrook finished strong, adding another 44-yard touchdown pass to Ryan, and holding the Tiger’s offense to under 30 yards down the stretch.
Without much to add, Curit believed his team simply was not mentally prepared for the playoff clash.
“We lost a lot of tough games this year. I thought we had a good week of practice, but we did not have the intensity needed to win and (we) were beat by the better team,” said Curit.
— Sports Staff Writer Alex Sponseller can be reached at [email protected] or at 282- 1535 ext. 323.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less