TOPSHAM
Good pitching, good defense and good hitting is a hard combination to beat and the Mt. Ararat High School softball team did it all to defeat Lewiston in a well-played Kennebec Valley Athletic Conference game on a crisp spring day.
Alana Weaver scattered seven hits, threw strikes, let her fielders play defense and received some clutch hitting from the Eagles big boppers, Kaitlyn Cox and Sara Lamb, in a 6- 2 victory, giving Mt. Ararat a 2- 2 mark with a visit to Brewer scheduled for today at 5 p.m.
Lewiston took an early lead when Kallie May doubled and came home on a Meagan Gosselin single in the first inning.
The Eagles responded in the bottom of the inning. Weaver legged out an infield hit and Cox reached on a fielder’s choice. Cox stole second and Sara Lamb rocketed an RBI triple to the base of the right- center field fence to tie the game. Zoe Stilphen singled to drive Lamb home to give the Eagles a 2-1 lead.
Weaver went into cruise control on the mound, breezing through the next four innings and never facing more than four batters per inning.
The Eagles provided Weaver with some breathing room with two runs in the third and two more in the fourth. In the third, Kelsey Scannevin reached on an error, moved to second on a grounder and came home on a Cox line- drive double to left. Lamb rapped a sharp single up the middle to score Cox.
In the fourth, Laura Secone got things started with a single. Morgan Johnson laid down a perfectly placed bunt that she beat out to put runners on first and second. A Scannevin sacrifice bunt moved both runners into scoring position. Kayleigh Temple cashed in the chips when she lofted a towering drive to right- center field that plated both runners, Temple ending up on second.
Lewiston’s Danielle Cyr took over on the mound in the fifth and pitched two scoreless innings.
Lewiston narrowed the gap to 6- 2 in the sixth, but Weaver buckled down and retired Danielle Cyr on an infield pop- up. Lewiston threatened again in the seventh but failed to score.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less