Yarmouth’s Cory Langenbach would get the Clippers on the board with an early goal, shortly followed by another free position goal to give Yarmouth 2-0 advantage.
Despite a goal from Hallie Schwartzman that cut the deficit to 2-1, the Clippers would add another goal by Eliza Lunt to take the 3-1 lead at half, and would come out firing in the second and put up two more goals by Katie Waeldner and Lane to put the game out of reach for the Rams.
Gabby Fogg would tally a score late in the second half for Kennebunk, as well as teammate Erin Groton, however Yarmouth would also add two more goals front Lunt and Antolini to secure the win and avenge the 2016 loss.
Biddeford 16, Noble 1
The Tigers would cruise to a 16-1 win over hosting Noble on Thursday to improve to 9-1 and break the program’s record for wins in a season.
Peyton McKeown continued to impress for Biddeford, picking up a whopping seven goals and three assists in the win. Paige Laverriere, Hailey Allen and Grace Boisvert each picked up a hat trick as well, as the Tigers continued to prove itself as an offensive force in the Southern conference.
Eliza Gilliam and Ella McKenzie combined for 10 saves in the cage for the Tigers.
Rylee Collins netted the Knights’ lone goal, while goalie Kelly Cremmen recorded 12 saves in the loss.
Girls Tennis
Massabesic 4, Sanford 1
The Mustangs would pick up a 4-1 win over rival Sanford on Wednesday.
Massabesic’s Thyme Whitten topped Alaina Parison 6-0, 6-1 while Joanna LaFrance topped Alli Plante 6-0, 6-0 to give Massabesic the 2-0 lead. Sanford’s Corinne Lawrance would grind out a 6-4, 1-6, 6-2 win over Ivorie Dickinson to cut the lead to 2-1 heading into the doubles matches.
Katie Dupuis and Lyliana Pelletier would clinch the victory for Massabesic, winning their doubles match against Hannah Miller and Emilee Mathieu 7-5, 6-1. Sarah Doyle and Elizabeth Brown would then top Lauren Fink and Kim Works 6-3, 6-4 to secure the 4-1 win.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less