May 2, 2013

Evidence of 17th-century cannibalism discovered at Jamestown

By Mark St. John Erickson / McClatchy Newspapers

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. — Archaeologists and forensic scientists working with human remains recovered at Jamestown last summer reported Wednesday that their follow-up studies have turned up gruesome evidence of cannibalism that took place during the Starving Time of 1609-10.

click image to enlarge

Doug Owsley, who leads the division for Physical Anthropology at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, displays the skull and facial reconstruction of "Jane of Jamestown" during a news conference at the museum in Washington on Wednesday. Scientists announced they have found the first solid archaeological evidence that some of the earliest American colonists at Jamestown, Va., survived harsh conditions by turning to cannibalism.

The Associated Press

Analyzing the skull of a 14-year-old girl found in a refuse pit filled with butchered horse and dog bones, they discovered multiple evidence of sharp cuts and chopping blows aimed at the cranium, cheeks and mandible.

The location and number of the marks are consistent with the flesh and brain being removed, probably for consumption.

“This person did not know how to butcher an animal. What we see is hesitancy and lack of experience,” said forensic anthropologist Douglas Owsley of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History.

“But they were clearly interested in the cheek meat, the muscles of the throat and tongue and the brain,” he said.

Of about 300 English settlers living at James Fort in the winter of 1608, only about 60 survived to the spring.

Numerous accounts of cannibalism among the survivors surfaced soon afterward and have been debated by historians for years.

But the discovery of the butchered skull – combined with the context of other butchered animal bones in which it was found – provides the first physical evidence of the starving colonists’ desperate efforts to stay alive.

“How many were cannibalized is unknown,” said historian and vice president James Horn of Colonial Williamsburg.

“But we don’t believe this young woman was a lone case.”

“We’re calling her ‘Jane,’ ” Horn added.

“We wanted to give her a name.”

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)



More PPH Blogs