February 2

Art Review: ‘Traces’ not easy to follow, but well worth exploring

Deborah Klotz’s show at the Maine Jewish Museum is for anyone interested in conceptual art, craft, alchemy, Judaica, sculpture or semiotics.

By Daniel Kany

Deborah Klotz’s “traces” is a show featuring smart, handsome and often fascinating works that flit and flutter among media with uncanny fluency.

click image to enlarge

“Trace/Trail,” cast glass with steel chain inclusions.

Contributed photos

click image to enlarge

“Milk and Honey #1”

Additional Photos Below

ART REVIEW

“TRACES” – PRINTS AND SCULPTURE BY DEBORAH KLOTZ, CURATED BY NANCY DAVIDSON

WHERE: Maine Jewish Museum, 267 Congress St., Portland

WHEN: Through Feb, 21

HOURS: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday to Friday, or by appointment

INFO: 773-2339; mainejewishmuseum.org

ARTIST TALK: 4 p.m. Sunday

“Traces” includes sandcast glass sculptures with steel chain inclusions, drawings on pages of well-studied copies of Dante, microscope photographs, various types of prints, folios of cast-shaped handmade paper with wire-crotched nuggets and sculptures that combine these and other media as well.

Klotz’s sandcast glass works are particulary elegant. The series of six “Trace/Trail” oval-plate-shaped pieces stand in lighted and back-mirrored wall mounts in a presentation that almost transcends the objects – solid glass that is clear on one side and textured where the molten glass touched the sand in which it was poured. Within the glass float long steel chains reminiscent of dog tags, light switch pulls – or, more poetically, strands of DNA or say, a map of sandy wanderings.

“Milk and Honey #1,” for example, lists its material as “crotched steel objects, handmade paper, iron monoprints with ink, plaster, poured iron, cast glass, walnut ink.” Ironically, the demolition-site-like list doesn’t do a bad job describing the look of the piece. But it doesn’t convey its alchemical subtleties or how it develops as sculpture – or better, as craft: The glass and iron are both poured forms and these flow out like leaking feet from the center of the piece. Moving upward and outward are paper and crotched wire elements that take the form of blossom-like conical vessels. The rust-trace forms on the paper along with its withered edges furthers an aesthetic of ancient realms seen at a distance while drawing the viewer in close with hints of still-life and craft modes.

It’s like encountering a blossom in a garden of ancient history; it draws you in intimately, but holds you at a respectful arm’s length – as might the first blossom in your yard after a long white winter.

“Milk and Honey #1” is the first piece in “traces” and it immediately brings on the show’s dilemma: To what extent can we find or assign meaning to these works?

“Milk and Honey” is the well-known reference to the land of Israel from the Hebrew Bible’s story of Moses’ vision of the burning bush (Exodus 3: 1-22). Considering this and that “traces” is on view at the Maine Jewish Museum, it is commonsensical to try to interpret Klotz’s work primarily in terms of Jewish content. But this is a mistake that, unfortunately, would likely trip up all but the most experienced art audience – or anyone predisposed to see the work as fine craft.

In short, “traces” is a beautiful show that is very accessible if you approach it as fine craft or object-oriented concept-driven art.

Concept-driven art is now the leading form of contemporary art in Maine. It is conceptual art that values craftsmanship and finish instead of exerting conceptual art’s traditional trope of pushing execution to the side as a perfunctory necessity.

The problem is that in this context, Klotz’s work (accidentally?) calls out for interpretive analysis – as opposed to experiential or performative understanding. In the Judeo-Christian traditions, it’s called “exegesis” when applied to texts and “hermeneutics” in the broader sense of interpreting both verbal and non-verbal communications.

This is a problem, because anyone seeking to find satisfying meanings through hermeneutics (sorry about the seemingly hefty art-speech terms here, but please believe me that these have more to do with the history of Western religion and philosophy than anything hip in NYC) will either be left wandering unquenched in the desert or will get mere crumbs of Klotz’s content.

If, on the other hand, you follow Klotz’s formal (as in “design”) fascination with materials and the aesthetic and textural complexities, you can more easily access her poetic intertwining of things/materials/objects. “Traces,” after all, are physical impressions that things leave upon each other; they are markers of interactions, hints of history and bits of information. Traces are how we track our quarry, solve a crime or diagnose an illness. Traces are not the thing, but the weay to the thing: Traces mark an otherwise hidden path.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors


Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

“Compression with Expansion ‘A,’” cast glass, handmade paper, iron filings, pigment, steel, fabric, wire, magnets, iron and silkscreen.

click image to enlarge

Installation view

 


Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


 

Blogs

More PPH Blogs