May 30, 2010

How America came to modern art (and vice versa)


The Bowdoin College Art Museum is featuring a compelling pair of exhibitions about how pictorial modern art came to America.

click image to enlarge

Oscar Bluemner’s “Landscape with Arched Trees,” 1918, gouache.

Bowdoin College Museum of Art, Museum Purchase, George Otis Hamlin Fund

click image to enlarge

Untitled (unfinished sketch of trees) by William Zorach, circa 1917, watercolor over graphite.

Bowdoin College Museum of Art, gift of Dahlov Ipcar and Tessim Zorach

Additional Photos Below


WHAT: Methods for Modernism: Form and Color in American Art, 1900 to 1925

WHEN: Through July 11

WHAT: Learning to Paint: American Artists and European Art, 1876-1893

WHEN: Through July 3

WHERE: Bowdoin College Museum of Art, 9400 College Station, Brunswick. 725-3275;

HOURS: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday (Thursday until 8:30 p.m.); Sunday 1 to 5 p.m.

COST: Free

"Learning to Paint" focuses on American art's relationship to 19th-century Europe and the development of an American art world. It showcases some fantastic talent: John Sloan, Albert Bierstadt, Maurice Prendergast, Mary Cassatt and Winslow Homer, to name a few.

My favorite part of the show is two portraits hung side by side: one by Munich-educated William Merritt Chase and the other by Paris-educated John Singer Sargent. Chase's picture exudes bold clarity and sharply honed marks in extreme contrast to Sargent's liquid-stroked virtuosity in rendering soft light (rather than bare skin or base material).

The bridge between the two shows is Winslow Homer's painting of fountains at the 1892 Columbian World's Exposition in Chicago. Homer tips his hat to the Old World: classical sculpture in elegant fountains fronted by a gondola held in relief by the well-lighted gushers at night. It looks like the Old World but tastes like the new, with electric lights and America as an international presence, painted in a style intended to dispel (or at least ignore) the patriarchal fetters of European cultural dominance.

Homer might be adored here for his strong Maine connection, but he was then seen by critics as utterly unrefined -- even "bald and crude," as Bowdoin professor Linda Docherty notes in her essay for "Learning to Paint" in the forthcoming (next month) catalog for this pair of exhibitions.

Docherty's essay presents a clear and insightful introduction to the education of American artists and the birth of a distinctly American art. She cites the intellectual endeavor undertaken by the entire arts community, including the call for American art criticism offering (quoting Scribner's Monthly from 1879) "sound principles of art, which will enable us to form judgments and understand" the work of contemporary painters. Critics were being called to educate the public and challenge the painters' "language" of art.

The main catalog essay is by Diane Tuite, who curated "Methods for Modernism." While I don't agree with many of her positions or conclusions, this is the most interesting and instructive exhibition catalog I have read in several years: It is a must read -- especially for artists and students of art.

Tuite pursues the discussion about educating American artists in styles opposed to the Academy and importing European modern art to America.

She privileges the role of photography in constructing an American modern art -- not only in her essay, but in the exhibition, "Methods for Modernism," which is loaded with big names (Matisse, Kandinsky, Picasso, etc.) and great Mainers (William Zorach, Marsden Hartley, John Marin, etc.), but also many great works of art in an extremely handsome show featuring 55 paintings and photographs.

The exhibition revolves around partisan debates about the roles of line (disegno) and color. This is an old topic, but Tuite presses the idea that photography was a huge player in developing modern art in America.

Considering that photographer Alfred Steiglitz's photo gallery "291" was the leading importer of cutting-edge European modernism and that Camera Work, for example, was a leading intellectual American arts journal, Tuite is on to something.

But she seems to swallow the pro-photography cheerleading without sufficiently considering the role of self-interest on the part of those arguing photography was unquestionably fine art -- something the public still hasn't fully accepted.

"Methods for Modernism" sets a debate with line and photography on one side and color on the other.

Joseph Stella's "Spring" (1915) is a masterpiece and the clear star of the show. It looks like a stream exploding into a million shards of scintillating color. While it's easy to argue it's an abstraction with no recognizable subject, I see it as a wildly blossoming spring defined by color: green.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

Joseph Stella’s “Spring (The Procession),” circa 1914-1916, oil on canvas.

Yale University Art Gallery, gift of Collection Societe Anonyme


Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)



More PPH Blogs