November 8, 2013

Bill Nemitz: Democrats fumble ball on human trafficking

By Bill Nemitz bnemitz@pressherald.com
Columnist

Let me put this as diplomatically as I can: Maine’s Democratic leaders ought to have their heads examined.

AIRING IT OUT

Tune in to NewsRadio 560 WGAN at 8:08 a.m. Friday to hear columnist Bill Nemitz talk about this column and other issues.

Only then might we discern how the Dems managed to take a quintessentially nonpartisan issue – human trafficking – and turn it into a textbook example of politics at its worst.

Let’s recap:

Last week, legislative leaders from both parties sat down to decide which proposed bills to accept for the upcoming legislative session and which to reject.

As usual, it was a rapid-fire opening round – only about 100 of 400 bills were granted the “emergency” status required for consideration during this winter’s short session. Sponsors of the unsuccessful bills will get a chance to appeal to the 10-member Legislative Council on Nov. 21.

High on that list will be “An Act to Protect Victims of Human Trafficking.” Its sponsor, Rep. Amy Volk, R-Scarborough, says it’s aimed at vacating convictions for prostitution if it can be proven that the person convicted was a victim of human trafficking and thus was forced to break the law.

A pressing issue worthy of the Legislature’s time and toil?

Volk sure thinks so, citing a recent report by the Polaris Project that puts Maine in the lower tier of states when it comes to combating sex trafficking and helping its victims escape with their futures at least partly intact.

In an interview Thursday, Volk recalled reading about the Polaris Project report this summer, right around the time the Preble Street social services agency accepted a $400,000 federal grant to combat sex trafficking in and around Portland. The time, she concluded, was ripe for legislative intervention aimed at preventing victims of sex trafficking from being re-victimized by the criminal justice system.

“I thought, ‘Well, I’m going to put in a (bill) title just in case no on else does it,” said Volk. “I fully expected somebody else who read (about the Polaris Project report) had acted on it quicker than I did.”

But alas, Volk was the only one to submit such legislation. And while she didn’t lobby the Legislative Council to let it go forward – “I really didn’t think I needed to. I sort of felt it was a good, bipartisan bill on a hot topic, an identified need” – she was surprised when the council voted 6-4 along party lines to spike the measure.

That, however, was only the beginning.

In a subsequent interview with the Maine Public Broadcasting Network, Maine Democratic Party Chairman Ben Grant dismissed Volk’s bill as the work of “a conservative legislator who is desperate to try to realign a gender gap that (her) party faces at the polls, and a representative who needs to kind of soften her hard edges.”

So much for the public policy debate. Them’s fighting words – and thus, however needlessly, the fight began.

Republicans, from state party Chairman Rick Bennett on down, protested from the high ground that Grant was out of line and owed Volk an apology.

Worse yet (at least for the Dems), they pointed out that one “emergency’ bill that made it through the Legislative Council’s gate was “An Act To Amend the Laws Regarding Special Food and Beverage Taste-testing Event Licenses,” sponsored by none other than Senate President Justin Alfond, D-Portland.

(Alfond, who went five-for-five in getting his bills into next session’s legislative hopper, said in an interview Thursday that the taste-testing bill is actually a business-friendly measure prompted by “a beer-tasting festival that went really bad” in Portland last summer.)

A harbinger of election-year battles to come? No doubt.

The pointless and counterproductive politicization of a serious social issue? That too.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)