November 22, 2013

Judge says Augusta landlord must allow city code inspections

Jim Pepin had argued that the city lacked probable cause to conduct such inspections.

By BETTY ADAMS Kennebec Journal

AUGUSTA — The city won the right to inspect eight apartment buildings owned by the city’s largest landlord Thursday after city officials said they are concerned that firefighters and tenants could be trapped in the event of a fire.

click image to enlarge

Jim Pepin

Kennebec Journal File Photo

Judge Beth Dobson agreed to issue an administrative search warrant after a hearing in Augusta District Court in which the city’s fire chief and a code enforcement officer testified.

Landlord Jim Pepin, through his attorney, Skip Spurling, had argued the city lacked probable cause to support a search warrant for the buildings at 9, 31, 37, 41, 69 and 80 Washington St., as well as at 2 and 4 Stewart Lane, a total of 43 rental units, according to city assessor records.

Stephen Langsdorf, the city’s attorney, sought the search warrant to gain access to the buildings after Pepin did not agree to allow fire and code enforcement officials inside.

“The search is not limited to looking solely at the issues identified but would be broader,” Dobson said in a ruling from the bench. She said Langsdorf could draft the search warrant and she would sign it.

Langsdorf requested 45 days for the city to do the inspections. Outside the courthouse, he said 10 days is the norm, but usually when only one building is involved.

Langsdorf said the inspections can prevent problems. He said the city’s concerns include “a possibility of catastrophic fire, possibility of injury to emergency personnel” and risks to other buildings in the densely populated area. “People could be trapped and fire escapes can catch on fire.”

The eight buildings are all in the Sand Hill section of the city.

Outside the courthouse, Pepin, who lives in Augusta, said he had no comment.

“Mr. Pepin has always been willing to cooperate with the city,” Spurling said, adding that “the city did not want to negotiate.”

He said it was Pepin’s constitutional right to make the city get a search warrant to enter the premises.

In a previous ruling, Dobson indicated she was likely to issue a warrant for inspections of 80 Northern Ave. and 2 Stewart Lane. She wrote, “The court determined that the requirements for a search warrant were generally met, namely that the city is authorized to conduct inspections of housing for suspected fire code violations. ...”

She ended by saying, “The court does not need to go so far, but it is possible to conclude that a warrant could issue for all buildings with the same owner, relying solely on the allegations and probable cause findings with respect to one building.”

Augusta Code Enforcement Officer Robert Overton testified Thursday that he had previously dealt with Pepin over code deficiencies and was not permitted to inspect the inside of these eight buildings.

Overton testified about problems he saw from the outside of the buildings:

• 4 Stewart Lane has only one safe means of exiting the building. “The second way is a ladder bolted to side of building,” Overton said. He also said the windows that open to the ladder “appear to be undersized.”

• 9 Washington St.’s egress “is nonconforming as far as heights of guards or handrails. The egress windows are undersized, and it does not appear to have correct number of egress windows from the upper stories,” Overton said.

• 31 Washington St. units only have one suitable means of exit. A second exit consists of platforms outside of windows with ladders that lead to the ground, which Overton classified as unsuitable. He also said the windows appear undersized.

• 37 Washington St. has ladders for second exits and “clearly undersized” windows.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)