February 1

Maine rail bankruptcy likely to spawn more lawsuits

A trustee expects a fund for victims of the Quebec train disaster to total in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

By J. Craig Anderson canderson@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

Companies involved in the bankruptcy case of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway will probably begin suing each other, potentially dragging the case out in the courts, said lawyers Friday at a hearing on whether to consolidate 20 related wrongful-death cases against the railroad and move them to Maine.

click image to enlarge

Attorney Peter DeTroy, right, who represents a petroleum transportation firm, and other lawyers walk to a federal bankruptcy hearing in Portland on Friday.

John Patriquin/Staff Photographer

The goal of the companies involved in the railroad’s massive Chapter 11 reorganization will be to divert blame for the derailment and explosion of a train loaded with crude oil that killed 47 people and destroyed 40 buildings in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, on July 6.

Defendants named in the wrongful-death cases include companies that drilled the oil, labeled and loaded it onto the train, built the rail cars, leased the cars, built the engine and operated the train.

Each one will try to place blame for the disaster on the others, likely leading to the various parties litigating or settling their respective lawsuits and pooling the judgments and settlements into a single fund to pay victims, lawyers’ fees and other judgments, said Robert Keach, a Portland attorney who is the trustee for the railroad in the bankruptcy case.

Keach said he hopes that fund will total in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

The first such lawsuit was filed Thursday by Keach against a list of defendants including Miami-based World Fuel Services Corp., which the railroad has accused of mislabeling the oil and then putting it in inadequately reinforced rail cars.

“We have just submitted a claim saying we’re not responsible for the accident,” Keach said during Friday’s hearing.

In all, the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway expects 47 wrongful-death cases and at least one class-action lawsuit involving thousands of plaintiffs who were injured, suffered property damage or were affected by the environmental disaster the derailment created.

The damages awarded in those cases are expected to total as much as $700 million, including an estimated $200 million for victims and $200 million to $500 million for environmental cleanup, Keach said. The railroad’s insurance policy covers no more than $25 million, plus coverage for legal fees.

Not everyone at Friday’s hearing in U.S. District Court in Portland favored combining the derailment victims’ lawsuits and paying judgments out of a single fund.

Daniel Cohn, a Boston attorney, represents a group of wrongful-death claimants who filed a total of 20 lawsuits, including 19 in Illinois. He said that transferring his clients’ cases to Maine because of the bankruptcy would be a “terrible injustice.”

The 20th case was filed in Pennsylvania by Sarah Troester, a Delaware resident whose husband, Jefferson Troester, was a railroad engineer who was crushed to death in 2012 when two 1,500-pound rolls of newsprint fell out of a Montreal, Maine & Atlantic rail car.

“There will be no significant recovery in the bankruptcy, probably for anyone,” Cohn said. “I’ve never yet seen anybody walk away happy from a bankruptcy case.”

Claimants in the wrongful-death cases also are suing some of the owners of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic’s parent company, Rail World Inc., including its president and CEO Edward Burkhardt, as well as World Fuel Services, which they have accused of mislabeling the oil, and the rail car manufacturer, Union Tank Car Co.

The plaintiffs claim that the oil was more volatile than its labels suggested, and that the cars carrying it had a history of rupturing in derailments.

Cohn wants the lawsuits to be tried in Illinois, not Maine, which caps payouts at $400,000 in wrongful-death cases on damages that are not easily assigned a monetary value, such as emotional stress.

“If the defendants didn’t perceive that there would be a big advantage in bringing this case out of Cook County (Illinois), they would not have called for this action,” he said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)