April 10, 2013

President Obama's budget cuts debt, entitlements

As he strives for 'grand bargain,' the president's $3.8 trillion budget includes both Republican and Democratic ideas, which could anger everyone.

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — In the first budget of his second term, President Obama set aside the grand ambitions that marked his early days in office and sent Congress a blueprint aimed at achieving a simple goal: ending the long partisan standoff over the national debt.

click image to enlarge

President Obama, accompanied by acting Budget Director Jeffrey Zients, speaks about his proposed 2014 federal budget at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday.

The Associated Press

Related headlines

The 10-year budget request that Obama unveiled Wednesday calls for nearly $300 billion in new spending on jobs and public works. That includes a landmark $77 billion expansion of preschool education financed by smokers, who would have to pay an extra 94 cents a pack for cigarettes.

But barely five months after winning a decisive re-election victory, Obama proposes nothing on the scale of the $1.2 trillion initiative to extend health coverage to the uninsured that he pursued after taking office in 2009.

Instead, with sharp automatic spending cuts threatening to slow the economic recovery and another showdown over the federal debt limit looming this year, the blueprint establishes a budget deal with Republicans as Obama's top fiscal priority. For the first time, he is formally proposing to trim scheduled Social Security benefits, a Republican demand that is anathema to many Democrats. He is also offering to make meaningful reductions in Medicare benefits, including higher premiums for couples making more than $170,000 a year.

"With this budget, you can't say the president isn't leading. He's clearly leading," said Robert Greenstein, president of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "Whether one agrees or disagrees with the specific policies, he has definitely stepped up to the plate to try to break the gridlock."

House Republicans and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., quickly dismissed the proposal, which formalizes an offer they rejected in December. McConnell called the cuts to Social Security and Medicare too "modest" to justify Obama's bottom-line demand for nearly $700 billion in new taxes on the wealthy, primarily through new limits on itemized deductions for households in the top brackets.

"I don't see this as fundamental entitlement reform as much as clarifying a statistic which does happen to save money," House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said of Obama's offer to apply a less-generous measure of inflation -- known as the chained consumer price index, or chained CPI -- to Social Security benefits.

Some rank-and-file Republicans in the Senate were more complimentary. Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said Obama is "talking about Medicare reform, he's talking about entitlement reform, and it will be interesting to see where the conversation goes."

Isakson and other Republican senators, including Maine's Susan Collins, were scheduled to join Obama for dinner Wednesday evening at the White House. With McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, showing no interest in further talks, administration officials see Senate Republicans as their best hope for advancing a bipartisan agreement.

Obama warned during remarks Wednesday in the Rose Garden that the budget represents his bottom-line offer. Any deal, he said, must not only replace "the foolish across-the-board spending cuts," known as the sequester, that are "already hurting our economy," but also raise revenue from "the wealthiest individuals and biggest corporations."

Of the entitlement cuts, Obama said, "I don't believe that all these ideas are optimal, but I'm willing to accept them as part of a compromise." He added: "When it comes to deficit reduction, I've already met Republicans more than halfway. So in the coming days and weeks, I hope that Republicans will come forward and demonstrate that they're really as serious about the deficits and debt as they claim to be."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)