Friday, December 6, 2013
Miscalculations and missteps by Angus King's campaign have some political observers saying the former governor is closer to losing Maine's U.S. Senate race than he should be.
Independent Maine U.S. Senate candidate Angus King
Ryan Boyd, field assistant with the Angus King for U.S. Senate Campaign, ties a balloon up to the campaign's fair booth at the Cumberland County Fair on Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2012.
Shawn Patrick Ouellette / Staff Photographer
The same people say that even the most pessimistic polling numbers for the independent show he's still in command of the race. But it's clear that his handlers recognize it's time to change strategy and have vowed to retool a campaign that has been criticized for its passivity, complacency and messaging.
Close observers of the campaign said Tuesday, six weeks before Election Day, that the public has seen and heard little of King's charisma, his achievements and his policy positions. Instead, Mainers have seen and heard nearly $2 million worth television and radio ads that have defined King as a governor who mismanaged state finances and a beneficiary of political cronyism.
Michael Cuzzi, a former Democratic campaign strategist who manages the Portland branch of VOX Global, a Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm, said King's team was slow to transition from a classic front-runner campaign.
"I'm not privy to the campaign's internal strategy here, but it seems to me that they've been relying upon the idea that he's very well known, he has high name recognition, he's very well respected and that is sufficient to carry him," said Cuzzi, who writes a periodic column for the Maine Sunday Telegram. "I think what they're now finding is that's not the case, particularly when faced with this barrage of outside money.
"This campaign isn't tanking and it isn't in imminent danger," Cuzzi said, but "it appears that it has stumbled a bit in finding its footing and responding in an appropriate way" to attacks.
Others note that the campaign has made public relations mistakes that have been repackaged and rebroadcast by opponents.
The campaign first made news for requesting the removal of a Twitter account that parodied the governor. It was later mocked for initially requiring raffle winners to have background checks before eating hot dogs with King and his wife, Mary Herman.
Most recently, the campaign was criticized for editing critical statements from a 4,000-word profile of King in this week's Maine Sunday Telegram before posting it on the campaign website.
That overshadowed the campaign's attempt to seize the initiative against one of its main antagonists, the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The campaign called a news conference Monday to announce that it would sue Maine television stations if they kept airing ads by the Republican group that attack a wind power project that King helped to develop in Roxbury.
The campaign said the ad is deceptive and contains false claims. It released a rebuttal ad featuring Roxbury residents who support the project.
Some analysts say the ad may be the strongest that King's campaign has released. But attention suddenly shifted back to King's campaign, which had to answer questions about redacting critical passages from the Maine Sunday Telegram profile.
Questions about the campaign started before the selective edits.
On Monday, King's campaign manager, Kay Rand, was asked by reporters why it had taken so long to fight back against Republican attacks.
She said that "in hindsight," perhaps the campaign should have contested an earlier ad by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. King's team hotly contested claims in the ad but didn't ask TV stations to stop airing it and didn't counter with an ad of its own.
Rand acknowledged that the campaign knew early that Republicans would attack King's involvement with the wind power industry.
Political observers say King's handlers miscalculated the impact of the negative ads.
Dennis Bailey, who was King's communications director when King was governor, said the campaign made a mistake by not immediately countering the first U.S. Chamber ad.
(Continued on page 2)