August 2, 2012

Plan to cut MaineCare at crossroads

The federal agency that must grant Maine a waiver to eliminate health care coverage for 27,000 people says the request appears 'inconsistent' with the law.

By Steve Mistler
Staff Writer

and Kevin Miller
Staff Writer

The LePage administration has raised the stakes in a confrontation with the federal government over budget cuts that would eliminate health care coverage for about 27,000 low-income Mainers.

click image to enlarge

Mary Mayhew, the commissioner of the Department of Health & Human Services, right.

Kennebec Journal file photo

Related headlines

On Wednesday, the state asked the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to approve changes to Maine's Medicaid plan that would save $19.93 million and balance the budget.

But officials with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the federal agency whose approval is needed, suggested that the state's request is "inconsistent" with the law.

Accounting for some overlap, the changes would end benefits for an estimated 24,000 parents, 6,848 19- and 20-year olds and 1,825 Medicare recipients who also receive limited benefits under Medicaid, which operates in Maine as MaineCare.

Although the cuts appear to require a waiver of Medicaid standards that the DHHS has never granted to any state, the LePage administration contends that such waivers are no longer necessary, because of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in June on the Affordable Care Act.

Others contest that interpretation of the court ruling and maintain that it doesn't affect the type of waiver that would apply to Maine's request.

The dispute over the waiver requirement could lead to another lawsuit. If the state loses, it could be forced to reimburse the DHHS for the $19.93 million in expected savings, which Maine drew on to balance its budget this year.

Although the DHHS has 90 days to act on the state's request, Maine has asked for a ruling by Sept. 1.

Mary Mayhew, commissioner of the state DHHS, said Wednesday the state has made a strong argument for the federal government to act quickly.

In Gov. Paul LePage's cover letter to U.S. DHHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the governor stressed that the cuts are necessary to preserve the state constitutional mandate for a balanced budget.

Brian Cook, spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said the state certified that it has a budget deficit and, as a result, the agency will work with Maine officials as they seek to end Medicaid coverage for adults with income above 133 percent of the poverty line, as allowed by the law.

Disabled or pregnant adults in that income bracket would still be covered by Medicaid.

"Maine's new request, however, would also end coverage for others who are now enrolled in the program," Cook said in a written statement. "Maine appears to acknowledge that this request is inconsistent with the terms of the applicable federal statute, but we will fully review its submission."

If Sebelius rejects the plan, LePage could try to claim that the federal government is hampering the state's ability to balance its budget, an argument that is consistent with the national Republican-led opposition to the health care law.

Sebelius has not made any declarations about the waiver provision.

The situation in Maine is unique.

Many states with Republican governors -- and a few with Democratic ones -- have spurned future Medicaid expansions that are now encouraged, and more than 90 percent funded, by the health care law.

Maine appears to be one of the only states to book budget savings based on a reduction of Medicaid expansions that already have been made.

Democrats point to a recent opinion from the Congressional Research Service, which works as a think tank for Congress, saying the U.S. Supreme Court decision did not change the waiver requirement.

However, Thomas Barker, a former general counsel in the federal DHHS and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, takes the opposite position.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)