March 27, 2013

Newlywed Mainers hope court cleans up a tax mess

By Jessica Hall jhall@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

When Annie McPheeters and Meredith Johnson got married at South Portland City Hall on Dec. 29, they barely considered the complications they would face when filing tax returns as a newly married, same-sex couple.

click image to enlarge

A court ruling overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act would simplify tax filing for same-sex Maine couples like Lisa Ward, left, and Mel Cloutier of Lisbon.

John Patriquin/Staff Photographer

Related headlines

"In the back of my mind, I knew it would be trickier," Johnson said.

But just weeks after getting married, McPheeters and Johnson hired an accountant for the first time to help them sort through the quirks of filing under their new status.

For Mainers in their situation, filing taxes is not just an annoying task. It's complicated by the fact that they are considered married by the state and single at the federal level, where same-sex marriage is not recognized. The distinction could add hundreds of dollars to a couple's federal tax obligation.

The issue comes to the forefront Wednesday as the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a case challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act, dubbed DOMA, which defines marriage as solely between a man and a woman.

Because federal law does not recognize same-sex marriage, same-sex couples can't file federal returns jointly, even if the state in which they live recognizes their union.

A ruling in the case could come as early as June. Overturning the law could have wide-ranging effects on the finances of same-sex couples. There are more than 1,100 separate federal provisions that address marital status, including more than 200 provisions in the tax code alone, accountants said.

"It's a quirky situation. It feels a little funny," said Donna Galluzzo, who married her partner of three years, Lisa Gorney, shortly after midnight on Dec. 29 in Portland.

Because same-sex couples cannot file joint federal returns, they are prevented from combining incomes and deductions. So depending on their incomes, they could face higher tax rates and greater expenses, accountants said.

Consider, for example, a same-sex couple with no children who take the standard deduction on combined earnings of $100,000, with one partner earning $70,000 and the other earning $30,000.

If allowed to file jointly as a married couple, the couple's tax obligation, after a standard deduction of $11,100, would be $14,091, according to tax tables on the IRS website.

But because they would have to file individually, the couple's combined obligation -- after each takes a standard deduction of $5,950 -- would be $15,225, a difference of more than $1,100.

The difference is less pronounced if each person earns similar amounts, according to the IRS website.

In addition to different tax bills, same same-sex couples also have a few extra steps to go through.

"Taxes aren't super sexy, but you have to figure it out," Galluzzo said. "It's something different for us. It's not the classic male-female marriage."

Since the state tax filing is calculated based on the federal return, a same-sex couple must create a separate federal return as if they were married. That allows them to determine their federally adjusted gross income to use on their state returns. The separate return doesn't get filed with the federal government.

The couple has to file their actual federal returns as single individuals, said Kathleen DeBaker, senior tax adviser with H&R Block in Portland.

"It's one extra small step, but it's definitely an odd step, having to do each differently," McPheeters said.

Lisa Ward and Mel Cloutier of Lisbon had a wedding ceremony on Dec. 31 with a handful of family and close friends in front of town hall. Because of a clerk's error, however, their marriage wasn't official until 2013.

"We actually thought about taxes and legal issues and wanted to get married in 2012, in part because of that," Ward said. "We were disappointed and the clerk could not have been more apologetic. We understood. But it was disappointing since we were so excited to finally get married."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)