Friday, April 18, 2014
By Kevin Miller firstname.lastname@example.org
WASHINGTON – Federal health officials say Agent Orange and other herbicides that were sprayed at a Canadian military base posed no health risks to the thousands of National Guard members from Maine and other states who trained there for decades.
In this October 2001 file photo, Dean Dumond, a helicopter pilot with the 1st of the 137th Aviation Battalion of the Maine Army National Guard, checks flight notes while flying over Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in New Brunswick, Canada.
Gregory Rec / Staff Photographer
In this October 2001 file photo, Maine Army National Guardsmen load a round into a Howitzer gun on Saturday during training at the Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in New Brunswick, Canada. The guardsmen belonged to the Alpha Battery of the 1st Battalion, 152 Field Artillery.
Gregory Rec / Staff Photographer
But the findings by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are unlikely to satisfy veterans who believe their health problems are linked to the weeks they spent in the dirt at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in New Brunswick. And U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, expressed disappointment at the scope of the review.
"While I appreciate that the CDC shares my concerns about the health of our service members and veterans who trained at Gagetown, I am disappointed that it does not appear that the thorough investigation the administration promised to undertake went beyond a review of the pre-existing Canadian report," Collins said Tuesday.
In June, Collins asked the CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to review a 2007 Canadian study of health risks from herbicides used at Gagetown and advise her office on levels of chemicals that were sprayed at the base. The CDC expressed no qualms with the Canadian report's findings.
"We concluded that concentrations of contaminants at CFB Gagetown did not represent a public health hazard to members of the U.S. military or National Guard," CDC Director Thomas Frieden wrote to Collins on March 1 in a letter accompanying the report. "While exposures may have occurred during training at CFB, the levels of herbicide were below levels of concern for both cancerous and non-cancerous health effects."
The Gagetown training base, southeast of Fredericton, was used by thousands of National Guard members from Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and other states from 1971 to 2006. Units often spent two weeks training at the base, with more than 250,000 acres, 700-plus buildings and 1,500 miles of roads. More than 300,000 Canadian military personnel served or trained at Gagetown as well.
Veterans on both sides of the border -- including more than 100 in Maine -- have been struggling for years to qualify for disability benefits for ailments they blame on the use of herbicides and defoliants at Gagetown.
At the top of the list of chemicals is Agent Orange, a defoliant that was widely used during the Vietnam War and has been linked to cancer, Hodgkin's disease, birth defects and other diseases. Canadian officials also sprayed large quantities of other herbicides and defoliants at Gagetown over the decades.
Veterans administration officials in the U.S. and Canada have rejected almost all claims except those filed by service members who served at Gagetown in 1966 and 1967, when the U.S. military tested Agent Orange there.
But many of the veterans whose claims were denied believe that the other chemicals -- including close relatives to Agent Orange -- may be causing their health problems.
The CDC did not do its own investigation of conditions at Gagetown. Instead, it reviewed the Canadian government's 2007 report on herbicide use from 1952 to 2004 at Gagetown. It agreed with the original report's conclusions after determining that the soil sampling methods, tests and risk assessment standards were the same as the CDC would have used.
"There is little to no increased risk of adverse effects on blood-forming tissues, the liver, and the central nervous system, and the risk of skin disorders or developmental effects is not enough to represent a public health hazard," says the report.
Collins suggested Tuesday that she had expected the CDC to probe deeper. Her request specifically asked the agency to review the 2007 report, and posed a series of questions about the amounts and concentration of herbicides used and the safety precautions.
(Continued on page 2)