April 16, 2013

N.H. governor urges House to pass bill OK'ing casino

Her proposed budget counts on $80 million from licensing a single casino in the state.

The Associated Press

CONCORD, N.H. – Don't let Massachusetts walk away with millions of dollars from casinos that could help New Hampshire pay for education, hospital aid and school construction, Gov. Maggie Hassan urged the House on Tuesday.

click image to enlarge

Lawmakers from a House panel listen to Gov. Maggie Hassan during a public hearing Tuesday April 16, 2013 at the Statehouse in Concord, N.H.Hassan urged members of the house to pass a bill to license a single casino in New Hampshire. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)

click image to enlarge

Gov. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., leaves a joint House panel public hearing Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at the Statehouse in Concord, N.H., after urging them to pass a bill to license a single casino in New Hampshire. Hassan urged the House on Tuesday not to let Massachusetts benefit from casino revenues that could help New Hampshire pay for vital services without raising taxes. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)

The House has consistently rejected casino bills over the years, but Hassan and casino supporters argued that the one before lawmakers now has a new urgency: New Hampshire will lose money once three casinos are finally licensed and operating in neighboring Massachusetts.

"We can no longer pretend that gambling isn't coming to our communities. It is already here," Hassan told a joint House committee.

Hassan told the lawmakers that the spending she seeks has bipartisan support.

"The choice comes when we consider how to pay for these crucial investments," she said.

A Senate bill passed last month would license a single casino with up to 5,000 video slot machines and 150 table games in New Hampshire. The proposal earmarks the revenue from gambling for highway improvements, higher education and economic development in the state's North Country.

Hassan's proposed budget counts on $80 million from licensing a casino and raising the tobacco tax 30 cents to $1.98 per pack of cigarettes.

The House passed a budget April 3 that splits the difference. It leaves out the gambling revenue but gives less money to higher education and hospitals than Hassan's budget calls for and places a moratorium on money for new school construction.

Senate Republicans won't build their budget using gambling money unless the House passes its casino bill and if the House doesn't, the Senate could cut spending as much as $100 million rather than raise taxes, said Senate Finance Chairman Chuck Morse, a Salem Republican and bill sponsor.

"We don't want to lose to Massachusetts," he said.

Hassan and state Sen. Lou D'Allesandro, a Manchester Democrat and the bill's prime sponsor, said arguments against gambling are similar to those made 50 years ago when New Hampshire legalized the lottery, when opponents warned the lottery would prove to be a tragic mistake.

"We do not have moral bankruptcy in New Hampshire," he said.

But Deputy Attorney General Ann Rice countered that the addictive nature of video slot machines is far different from scratch tickets and the other games allowed now. Rice said increased crime and social problems will come with a casino.

"Do not be lured by the promise of easy money coming into the state," she said.

House Judiciary Chairwoman Marjorie Smith said it was unlikely the money would be available for the two-year budget the House and Senate must agree to by July 1, since it would probably take two years from legislative approval to the day a casino opened its doors.

State Sen. Jeanie Forrester, a Meredith Republican, said a casino would hurt small businesses because people would spend their spare cash in a casino instead of buying their goods and services. She also said New Hampshire's traditional image as a family-friendly tourist state would be drowned out by millions in marketing spent by a casino to attract customers.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)