Sunday, May 19, 2013
View Mack Point in a larger map
By Tux Turkel firstname.lastname@example.org
Sudden, fundamental changes in the U.S. petroleum market are raising questions about the need for a 22 million-gallon liquid propane storage tank in Searsport, and whether the planned marine terminal could be used for exporting domestic fuel overseas, rather than for importing propane to Maine.
CHS Inc.'s new rail facility in the Biddeford Industrial Park can store 180,000 gallons of propane and move 20 millions gallons a year into Maine. The project is an example of how energy companies are responding to the glut of low-cost propane in the Northeast.
Those questions are in the background this week as the Searsport Planning Board holds four days of public hearings to determine whether the $40 million project would meet local land-use rules. But they are critical to the terminal's fate, and the answers will have a statewide impact.
The Northeast suddenly is awash in low-cost, domestic propane, and Maine homeowners and businesses are embracing it as a cheaper alternative to heating oil.
Anticipated demand set the stage three years ago for Denver-based DCP Midstream to propose an import terminal at the Mack Point cargo port in Searsport.
The plan made perfect sense. Maine nearly ran out of propane in 2007, because of a Canadian rail strike and severe winter weather. The incident revealed that Maine didn't have enough storage, and was too dependent on an unreliable means of transportation.
Since then, much has changed.
The Northeast shale gas boom has flooded the market with propane. That has helped make domestic prices the lowest in the world.
The low prices have made shipping propane to the United States from Europe and the Middle East a money loser. Only one vessel has called at each of New England's two operating marine terminals -- in Providence, R.I., and Newington, N.H. -- this year.
Some terminals that imported propane from overseas -- in Texas and Philadelphia, for instance -- now export U.S. fuel.
In New England, the surging domestic supply has sparked an unprecedented upgrading and construction of rail terminals and small storage tanks. CHS Inc., an agribusiness co-op in the Midwest, just opened a terminal in Biddeford that can store 180,000 gallons and move 20 million gallons a year.
Such developments have critics of the Searsport project questioning whether it might become an export terminal. Interest groups and some communities along the midcoast already oppose the tank, citing fears including increased truck traffic, the scale of the 14-story tank and the risk of explosion on the six ships that would be expected to call each year at Mack Point.
And exporting propane, they say, could require even more trucks and tankers.
"I think the business case for this import terminal evaporated a couple of years ago," said Steve Hinchman, a lawyer who represents the Thanks But No Tank citizens group. "We wonder if this a bait-and-switch tactic. Get it permitted, then say the market has changed."
Hinchman likens the project to a decade of failed efforts to develop terminals along Maine's coast to import liquefied natural gas. Similar market forces have cut imports at LNG terminals, including the new Canaport plant in Saint John, New Brunswick, which has been operating at roughly 30 percent capacity.
In the United States, owners of the terminals are seeking to export liquefied natural gas.
John Pratt, DCP Midstream's director of Northeast sales, said it would take two years to build the propane project, after approvals. Prices could change by then, he said, and again favor imports.
"In the current market environment, I can see why those questions would be asked," he said. "But that's not what we're trying to do now. We're trying to get a permit to bring import here."
(Continued on page 2)