September 9, 2012

Bill Nemitz: Atheists push back at almighty agenda

Rarely does a news release headline jump off the screen like this one that landed last week in my inbox: "Maine atheists to organize state lobbying group this month."

Good heavens. As if Maine doesn't have enough to argue about these days.

Later this week, the Secular Coalition for America will open its phone lines to anyone and everyone in Maine who a) doesn't believe in God, b) can't be sure there is a God or c) believes, regardless of his or her spiritual underpinnings, that government at any level should not be doing anything in the name of the man (or woman) upstairs.

"This is a cry that is not somewhere on the fringes," said Sean Faircloth, who directed the coalition until last year and still supports its effort to establish a chapter in each of the 50 states by year's end.

"This is a mainstream cry from America," Faircloth continued. "There is a cry in America saying, 'What is going on that we are constantly having religion imposed on us in American life?'"

Faircloth, you might remember, represented Bangor for four terms in the Maine House and one in the state Senate between 1992 and 2008. He now lives in Virginia and directs strategy and policy for the Richard Dawkins Foundation, which supports "scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering."

In other words, Faircloth is not just an atheist. He's an atheist who's built a new career on pushing back against a religious right that, in his opinion, has far more influence than it should over what goes on both in Washington, D.C., and in statehouses from Maine to California.

"I think the religious right is a minority that, to their credit, punches beyond their weight class," Faircloth said in an interview Friday. "But they're still a minority."

The state-level organizing -- in addition to Maine, the coalition will conduct "organizing calls" this week in nine other states and the District of Columbia -- comes at a noteworthy time in American politics.

Just a few days ago in Charlotte, N.C., the Democratic Party first removed any reference to God from its 2012 platform, only to hastily reinsert it over audible boos and catcalls from the convention floor.

Lauren Anderson Youngblood, communications manager for the Secular Coalition for America, saw that as a sign of the times.

"We outnumber many religions," Youngblood noted from the organization's headquarters in Alexandria, Va. "We outnumber Jews, Episcopalians, Mormons yet we're not represented at all. And part of the reason is we are not organized."

By "we," Youngblood means atheists (who don't believe there is a God), agnostics (who maintain the existence of God can neither be proved nor disproved), humanists (who promote human values sans religious doctrine) and other "free thinkers" whose bedrock beliefs spring from scientifically based evidence, not undying faith in the supernatural.

Here in Maine, at least, Youngblood appears to have a point: In May, the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies found that Maine has fewer citizens who claim religious affiliations (under 30 percent) than any other state in the nation.

On the same nontheistic note, a recent survey by the Pew Forum on Religious and Public Life put Maine at or near the bottom nationally when it comes to absolute belief in God (59 percent), daily prayer (40 percent) and attendance at a weekly worship service (23 percent).

Yet flip open Maine's Constitution and you'll find, right there in the preamble, that we are a people who acknowledge "with grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)