May 5, 2013

Our View: 'Gang of 11' tax plan shows how unity can pay big dividends

The nonpartisan proposal could stabilize our state's economy and spread out the tax burden.

It's not every day that five Democrats, five Republicans and one independent lawmaker announce that they have reached agreement on a major tax reform plan that addresses all of the state's most difficult fiscal issues.

click image to enlarge

R.J. Harper, right, an IRS-certified volunteer tax preparer, helps last-minute filer Ana Dana at Portland’s Forest Avenue post office on April 17, 2012. A proposal to reform Maine’s tax system is a long shot, given its timing, but it demands serious consideration from legislators and Gov. LePage.

2012 File Photo/John Patriquin

With only about a month left before the Legislature's statutory adjournment date, their ability to pass something this sweeping and complex is a long shot, especially considering the history of tax reform in this state.

But because of the credibility of the so-called "Gang of 11," particularly the bill's lead sponsor, independent Sen. Dick Woodbury of Yarmouth, this long shot demands serious consideration.

THE CENTRAL PRINCIPLES

Details are still emerging on the nonpartisan plan, but here are the key elements:

The income tax rate would be cut in half.

The inheritance tax would be eliminated.

Corporate income taxes would be slashed.

Resident property owners would get an exemption on the first $50,000 of the value of their home.

To keep the budget balanced, the sales tax would be increased from 5 percent to 6 percent, and almost all exemptions would be erased.

Meals and lodging taxes would go from 7 percent to 8 percent.

Taxes on tobacco and alcohol would be raised.

Refundable income tax credits would be used to help middle-class and low-income Mainers offset increases in consumption taxes.

We have some questions about this approach and will be following its progress very closely over the next few weeks.

Will this new system be fair enough, or would a huge tax cut for the rich be paid for by increased consumption taxes for everyone else?

Will enough revenue be collected to pay for the services Maine people rely on, especially education, health care and anti-poverty programs?

And will it receive the bipartisan support it would need to avoid the fate of the Democratic tax reform package passed in 2009, but overturned by the voters a year later? Early comments from key legislative Republicans indicate they may not stand behind it.

BROAD REFORM OF UNWORKABLE SYSTEM

But even with those questions, there's a lot to like here.

It reforms all the state's taxes, not just the income and sales taxes collected by the state. Cutting income tax rates doesn't offer much to benefit middle- and lower-income Mainers, but cutting escalating property taxes does.

And it exports more of the burden of funding state and local government to people who don't live here but benefit from our natural resources, roads and bridges and quality of life. Residents and nonresidents alike pay sales and property taxes, but only residents would get relief in the form of tax credits.

It also promises to bring predictability to state revenue, creating a more rational environment for discussions about government's size and scope.

Maine has been in a budget crisis for so long, it seems like business as usual. State revenue was failing to meet projections only a few months after the budget passed in 2007, and that was before the Great Recession hit.

Since then, sliding revenue has forced constant updates and cutbacks to services for children, senior citizens, veterans and disabled Mainers that few would have thought made sense in more normal times.

Nobody thinks the current fiscal system works. There are no defenders of the status quo.

The problems are well known: State tax revenue is too volatile. There are surpluses when times are good and shortfalls when the economy slows down.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)