June 18, 2013

Maine Senate approves weakened gun bill, disappointing advocates

One group is considering pushing for a statewide referendum to ask voters to mandate background checks for all gun sales.

By Michael Shepherd mshepherd@mainetoday.com
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA — It took two votes and some last-minute amendments Monday for the Maine Senate to pass a scaled-back version of what began as a strict gun-control proposal when introduced earlier this year.

Today's poll: Background checks

Would you support mandating background checks before all gun sales?



View Results

Related headlines

J. Thomas Franklin, president of Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence, a gun-control advocacy group, called the latest version of the bill "a huge disappointment."

The group is considering organizing a referendum election in 2014 to ask voters whether to mandate background checks before all gun sales, a provision that lawmakers took out of the bill before it passed in the Senate, he said.

A version of L.D. 1240, sponsored by Rep. Mark Dion, D-Portland, a former Cumberland County sheriff, passed the Senate late Monday without a roll-call vote. It faces further action in the House and Senate.

Earlier Monday, another version of the bill failed in the Senate 19-16 after it had passed the House of Representatives by a slim, 78-66 vote on Thursday. The new version is expected to pass in the House.

Four Democratic senators joined with Republicans and voted against the earlier, stronger version of the bill: Majority Leader Seth Goodall of Richmond, Assistant Majority Leader Troy Jackson of Allagash, John Patrick of Rumford and John Tuttle of Sanford.

The bill was a vehicle for ambitious gun-control reform when it was introduced earlier this year, but it was stripped of its most controversial elements, including mandatory background checks before all private gun sales and mandatory permitting before gun purchases.

Under the Senate version approved Monday, the bill would make it a Class D misdemeanor to intentionally or knowingly sell a gun to a person prohibited from having one, such as a convicted felon. It would also increase the fine for giving a false name to a dealer from $50 to $1,000.

David Trahan, executive director of the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine, which opposed the original version of the bill, said his group supports the version passed by the Senate on Monday.

But Franklin, called the Class D misdemeanor "a toothless violation" that places little responsibility on the seller.

"All a seller has to do to a buyer is say, 'You're not a convicted felon, are you?"' Franklin said. "If the buyer says, 'Not at all,' you can sell them the gun."

The version of the bill that failed in the Senate on Monday would have created a first-time civil violation for selling a gun to a person prohibited from owning one, such as a convicted felon. A seller would be partially or fully protected from prosecution if he or she had done a background check on the buyer. The version that passed struck that.

Trahan said the provision struck would have been onerous on the seller, creating a crime even if the seller unknowingly sold a gun to a prohibited person.

"I don't know how you'd police it other than having undercover police going around trying to buy guns from people," Trahan said. "There were a lot of unintended consequences that I don't think were thought out."

The National Rifle Association's lobbying arm blasted an email to members before the votes on Friday, urging them to contact legislators to oppose the bill.

The NRA email said the bill "attacks" private firearm transfers and "seeks to make drastic and unnecessary changes to current firearms laws that will unduly place law-abiding citizens at risk rather than addressing the true problems associated with purchases made under assumed identities."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)

Today's poll: Background checks

Would you support mandating background checks before all gun sales?



View Results


More PPH Blogs