The city’s proposed R6 zoning change would require that new housing developments offer a uniform proportion of “affordable” housing units at below-market prices.

This requirement to provide “affordable” housing units below their actual cost would compel developers to raise the cost of “market-rate” units in order to offset the subsidy for “affordable” units.

This would make “market-rate” housing less affordable to middle-income residents. In doing so, it would contribute to a hollowing-out of Portland’s housing market and thus lead to greater – not less – inequality in housing opportunities in our city.

Portland needs a balanced approach to housing availability in Portland – one that makes housing more available to Portland residents at all levels of income, not one that discriminates against the housing needs of middle-income households.

Portland has been successful in providing housing opportunities for a sizable proportion of our low-income population under our current zoning provisions.

Portland already has more than 4,000 subsidized housing units in use – more than 12 percent of our current housing stock. This is a higher proportion than in most communities in Maine and across New England.

As we seek to provide additional housing opportunities for our low-income residents, we should not be considering solutions that will lead to greater housing inequality and make housing less affordable for Portland’s middle-income residents.

Michael Mertaugh

Portland


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.