An Associated Press news story recently published in the Press Herald, “Kavanaugh may be no threat to Obamacare” (July 17), argues that Brett Kavanaugh might vote to uphold the Affordable Care Act based on a opinion written for a situation-specific case for one section of the law.
The article further argues that even if Kavanaugh were to vote to overturn the ACA that it might not matter because Chief Justice John Roberts might vote with the liberal justices.
Here’s another “might” to think about: One of the liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is 85 years old. She might die at any time, whether by natural causes or being hit by a bus crossing the street. If this were to happen during the Trump presidency, Donald Trump would be able to nominate a third Supreme Court justice, someone who would definitely rule to overturn not only Roe v. Wade, but also the ACA.
That is too many “mights” to bank on when considering a lifetime appointment as important as the United States Supreme Court and its role in protecting the rights of all Americans.
Jeffrey Kaplan
Biddeford
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.