FARMINGTON — A spokesman for Central Maine Power addressed a sometimes hostile audience Tuesday night about what the company sees as the benefits of its proposed 145-mile transmission line through western Maine and then heard many of his arguments rebutted by a representative of the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

Both groups were invited to the Farmington Community Center Tuesday to address the Board of Selectmen. The meeting drew a crowd of about 100 people, many of whom wore T-shirts that said “NO CMP Corridor.”

“Claims that Maine doesn’t need this project are unfounded,” CMP spokesman John Carroll said. “Maine is as much a part of New England as any other state. We are suffering the consequences of high pricing, the environmental consequences of carbon emissions and we are equally vulnerable to fundamental unreliability of supply. That’s what this project is intended to address – our fundamental environmental and economic challenges.”

In a 30-minute presentation that was sometimes interrupted by people voicing their opposition to the project, Carroll said New England as a region struggles with rising electricity prices, carbon emissions and problems with reliability.

The New England Clean Energy Connect project, which would bring hydropower from Quebec to Massachusetts through Maine, would reduce carbon emissions by an estimated 3.6 million metric tons per year, Carroll said.

The project also would lower the cost of energy in New England’s grid by about $40 million per year, Carroll said, though he noted that the Maine Public Utilities Commission has estimated the amount to be about half that.

Advertisement

Another representative of CMP, Gerry Mirabile, a permitting manager for the project, also spoke Tuesday on why CMP picked the route it did for the project. He said it was designed to zigzag around environmental areas of concern and avoid sensitive areas.

The company will also be paying close to $6 million to compensate for environmental impacts, he said.

Carroll also talked about a $258 million settlement agreement CMP has proposed that would include $140 million to help Maine ratepayers reduce their bills and an additional $50 million in rate relief for low-income customers over the next 40 years.

In Franklin County, the company has pledged $5 million to support economic development; $4 million for vocational programs and education in Franklin and Somerset County school districts; and $1 million for internships and scholarships at the University of Maine at Farmington.

Sue Ely, a staff attorney at the Natural Resources Council of Maine, also spoke Tuesday night, saying the group remains opposed to the project despite the recent settlement proposal from CMP.

“We believe this is still a bad deal for the state of Maine,” Ely said. “It won’t reduce greenhouse gas benefits globally. It is still cutting 53 miles of new corridor from Beattie Township to Caratunk, and it will still have impacts on deer wintering areas, wildlife, tourism and vernal pools.

Advertisement

Ely said the group also believes the project will jeopardize Maine’s in-state clean energy projects and jobs, and the proposed settlement is not enough when taken into consideration the money is spread over 40 years.

Finally, Ely said it is misleading to bill the project as if it were designed to address climate change.

“That’s not what this project is,” she said. “It’s CMP’s response to a bid request in Massachusetts. It’s not a solution by anybody looking to address the best solution to the problems in New England.”

Tuesday’s meeting came as the NECEC project remains under consideration. A decision from the Maine PUC is expected by the end of March or early April. Approvals are also needed from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Maine Land Use Planning Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department of Energy.

Residents in Farmington will also have the opportunity to vote March 25 in a symbolic vote on whether they support the project.

Rachel Ohm can be contacted at 612-2368 or at:

rohm@centralmaine.com

Twitter: @rachel_ohm


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.