In an age where so many issues divide us, there is one thing on which we can all agree: Life is better with pets. It’s not just anecdotal – scientific evidence confirms that having a pet is good for your physical and mental health.

Unfortunately, breed restrictions prevent many families from having certain types of dogs. This is often the case in affordable housing communities. A bill in Congress, the Pets Belong with Families Act, would fix this problem by prohibiting breed restrictions and discouraging size-based restrictions in public housing.

Currently, public housing authorities may impose arbitrary breed and size restrictions based on the false notion that certain types of dogs are more dangerous than others. But the data on dog bites are unreliable at best, and they are riddled with potential sources of error, making it impossible to claim that any one type of dog is more likely to bite. Additionally, research by organizations as diverse as the American Veterinary Medical Association and the American Bar Association have repeatedly shown that breed bans fail to protect public safety.

Rather than making communities safer, breed-discrimination policies exacerbate problems such as housing insecurity and inequality. Breed restrictions disproportionally impact those most in need of stable and secure housing. At their worst, breed-specific restrictions force families to either surrender their pets to animal shelters or choose potentially unsafe or unstable housing options. I ask Rep. Pingree to show her constituents that she supports equity in pet ownership, by cosponsoring H.B. 5828, the Pets Belong with Families Act.

Kim Schwickrath
Old Orchard Beach

Copy the Story Link

« Previous

Letter to the editor: We can’t afford to lose farms to PFAS contamination

Next »

Letter to the editor: Clarence Thomas has a clear conflict of interest