February 3, 2013

Art Review: Diverse print show poses edgy questions

By DANIEL KANY

Print shows, for some reason, are dotting the Maine landscape.

click image to enlarge

“HW12.25” by Henry Wolyniec

Photo by Jay York

click image to enlarge

“For the Two: Question #1” by Karen Adrienne

Courtesy photo

Additional Photos Below

ART REVIEW

"PRINTS: BREAKING BOUNDARIES," sponsored by the Center for Maine Contemporary Art

WHERE: Lewis Gallery, Portland Public Library, 5 Monument Square

WHEN: Through Feb. 23

HOURS: 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday to Thursday; 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Friday; 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday

INFO: cmcanow.org; portlandlibrary. com/programs/LewisGallery.htm

No one has been more active in mounting print shows recently than Bruce Brown, curator emeritus of the Center for Maine Contemporary Art. His "Prints: Breaking Boundaries" at the Portland Public Library is a good show. But it's also an important show, although a casual visit might not reveal why.

"Breaking Boundaries" is wildly diverse, and you might take this either way on first glance: You might think it lacks a compelling unifying theme, or you might get the idea that Maine has a ranging and highly energized printmaking culture.

Both are correct.

But honest survey exhibits seek disparate range, and if Brown has anything to offer, it's range.

"Breaking Boundaries," sponsored by the CMCA, is a lousy title, because it brings to mind iconoclastically anti-establishment energies, and that's not what's bubbling in the conceptual undercurrents. These works use the professional tactics and techniques of printmaking to reach across boundaries to conceptually common ground.

Few pieces stand out as you enter. You first see Ellen Roberts' giant "Light," which you might think is a banner sign, then Kristin Fitzpatrick's "Roof," a hanging rooftop form that is weak from above but comes alive architecturally when you look up through the backlit woodcut "shingles." I don't like it, but it's a revealing piece.

"High Chair" by Fitzpatrick's fellow MECA undergrad, David Twiss, is genuinely striking. With its incumbent black bib (very goth) and shaped chair back covered with an image of a rather vicious wolf, it's not for every baby. It is Gorey-dark and hilarious.

The work of Tanner Gasco-Wiggin impressed me. It's an Oak Street scene in spray paint and orange cheesecloth pretending to be a farm barn and silo. It's smart, sharp and conceptually restive.

This raises questions: Are students focusing on printmaking because they get lots of art from one matrix? Do they leave printmaking after school because it is cost-prohibitive? Or are they drawn to current conceptual ideas analogous to a post-digital digestion of Walter Benjamin's "Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction"?

I am inclined to think it's all of these and more. Specifically, I think the professional/technical qualities of printmaking make it the logical medium for the process/finish-oriented conceptualism we're seeing throughout Maine. Prints also stem from the intellectual epicenter of the post-Warhol, digital, Etsy-market style of the art world in which younger artists have grown up. The original and its aura, after all, are dissolved by iTunes, digital printing and the Internet.

While photography is suffering a digitally-inspired existential crisis, printmaking is enjoying a golden moment. Artists across mediums are being drawn to technical processes such as encaustic painting, wet-plate photography, glass blowing and printmaking.

Since the Internet became ubiquitous, fine print markets -- unlike photography -- have been professionally solid. This only increases the appeal of artists who then make unique interventions with the prints.

That is where "Breaking Boundaries" offers particularly interesting insights. Some artists, such as Elizabeth Jabar and Holly Berry, accessorize their works into sculpture (Berry's fold-out visual recipe book for squash soup is wonderful).

Shawn Brewer's classical architectural fantasy objects can be cut out and assembled (a before/after pair is on view), yet their brilliance is in the subtle dare: Could you take scissors to an etching?

I adore Meg Brown Payson's large (15 feet), subtle and quietly gorgeous "Silkwall" -- a lithograph/drawing hybrid that mobilizes the texture aesthetics of a biologically microscopic world to challenge abstract painting. The transparent silk floats 4 inches above the wall on which Payson has drawn similar images so that -- with feints and wit -- they echo each other.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors


Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

“John Muir once said” by Tom Hall

Courtesy photo

click image to enlarge

“The Mouth of the Lion” by Kyle Bryant

Photo by Jay York

 


Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


 

Blogs

More PPH Blogs