December 1, 2013

Scarborough disagrees with FEMA flood maps

The town says the findings show levels in the marsh area rising more than its independent study found.

The Associated Press

AUGUSTA — Maine communities are criticizing new maps proposed by the federal government that show future flooding risks near the state’s coast that could affect what kind of insurance property owners must buy.

The Flood Insurance Rate Maps released in November by the Federal Emergency Management Agency predict the future flooding levels in York and Cumberland counties. It’s only a preliminary version – municipalities have the chance to appeal and the final maps won’t be released until 2015.

Thousands of property owners who are said to be in a high-risk flooding zone in the new maps could be forced to buy flood insurance in 2015. Premiums could be affected for about 40 percent of the 9,000 Mainers who currently hold flood insurance, said Sue Baker of Maine’s Floodplain Management Program.

Kerry Bodgan, a senior engineer with FEMA, said nationwide – and especially in New England – the engineering and science behind existing maps are very outdated.

Several municipalities say they disagree with FEMA’s assessment and are paying Robert Gerber, a senior engineer and geologist with Ransom Consulting in Portland, to conduct an independent analysis of the risk.

FEMA is unable to do site-specific analyses because it has an enormous workload and a limited budget, Gerber said.

Tom Hall, town manager of Scarborough – which is spending about $300,000 on its own map – said he’s frustrated with the process.

“We find ourselves on behalf of our residents willing to spend local dollars to do some of the work that I would expect FEMA and their consultants to do, frankly,” he told the Maine Public Broadcasting Network.

Hall said hundreds of properties could be affected by FEMA’s findings, which show flood levels increasing in the Scarborough Marsh area by a foot or two more than what the town independent analysis found.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)