April 4, 2012

Bill Nemitz: Lawyer driven to wrongs by a killer

By Bill Nemitz bnemitz@pressherald.com
Columnist

What do you call a lawyer who's convinced that one of his former clients is a serial killer?

Rory Holland is serving life sentences for two 2009 murders in Biddeford, but he still was able to settle a score with his former attorney by filing a complaint with the lawyer oversight board.

Gregory Rec/Staff Photographer

Sorry, it's not a joke – at least not to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.

"Mr. Cote has become obsessed," wrote Justice Warren Silver in a recent four-page decision against Eric Cote, Esq., of Saco. "His wrongdoing is serious and his actions were detrimental to his former client."

And who might that client be?

Let's put it this way: If you thought you'd finally heard the last of Rory Holland, the convicted murderer and longtime lightning rod for all things controversial in Biddeford, think again.

And if you thought Holland's life story couldn't get more bizarre – it just did.

Holland is serving a double life sentence in the Maine State Prison in Warren for the shooting deaths of brothers Derek and Gage Greene in 2009 outside Holland's home in Biddeford.

His appeal of the conviction came and went in January, meaning he'll stay behind bars until the day he dies.

But Holland apparently still has scores to settle. And hard as it may be to believe, he just successfully settled one against his onetime attorney Cote.

It all started back in the fall of 2008, long before Holland's propensity for violence spilled over into a pair of late-night executions in the street outside his home on South Street.

Back then, Holland was busy trying to end a relationship with Susan Varney of Biddeford. One day, he approached Cote in court and asked if Cote could help him reach a "partition" settlement splitting up Holland's and Varney's shared real estate assets.

Cote agreed and helped negotiate the deal – although none of his arrangement with Holland was put in writing and Cote never charged Holland for the work.

Then things got sticky.

Holland eventually became unhappy with the settlement and asked Cote to appear at a court hearing regarding its enforcement. Cote refused.

"At that point, Mr. Holland threatened to 'put a bullet in Susan Varney's head and put a bullet in (Cote's) head,' " Justice Silver wrote in his decision. "Mr. Cote reported the threat to Ms. Varney's lawyer and she reported the threat to the police."

Cote, not surprisingly, also advised Holland to go find himself another lawyer.

Two months later, Holland murdered the Greene brothers.

Cote, according to court documents, felt "responsible for the deaths of the Greene brothers" – apparently because he didn't adequately pursue Holland's threat to shoot him in the head.

Hence Cote "embarked on a one-man crusade," as Silver put it, to prove that Holland's murderous streak went well beyond Derek and Gage Greene.

And how might Cote prove that?

He contacted Varney, who still had several pieces of Holland's property from a house they once had shared – including a computer and some 60 videotapes shot by Holland over the years.

"Mr. Cote then turned over the videotapes and the computer to the police investigating the (Greene) murders," wrote Silver.

Cote also handed over several drawings of naked women that had belonged to Holland.

Why?

"He believes that at least some of those drawings link Holland to various women who have been reported missing as well as various unsolved homicides," says a document in the court file.

As Holland's murder trial approached, his defense attorney asked the court to suppress all of the material collected by Cote. The judge refused, prompting Holland to claim later that the fruits of Cote's snooping prevented Holland from testifying in his own defense.

End of story? Not quite.

One year after the murders, Cote agreed to represent Tammy Cole, the mother of Derek and Gage Greene, in a wrongful-death lawsuit against Holland. That's when Cote logged onto a Facebook page called "Rory Holland Should Die."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)