May 18, 2013

Panel keeps ambitious Maine tax proposal alive

The Taxation Committee gives the bill a reprieve by ordering a full cost analysis of the bipartisan measure.

By Steve Mistler
State House Bureau

AUGUSTA – If not this, what? If not now, when?

Maine Rep. Gary Knight, R-Livermore Falls, is one of the bipartisan 'Gang of 11' trying to push through an ambitious tax overhaul in the Pine Tree State.

Those were the prevailing sentiments Friday of lawmakers on the Legislature's Taxation Committee, which inched forward on a dramatic tax overhaul proposal that aims to slash the state's income tax rate in half and make other sweeping changes, including raising sales and excise taxes and eliminating exemptions.

The proposal, released last week by a bipartisan coalition of 11 lawmakers, appeared to founder in the face of swift opposition from affected industry groups and a tepid response from Democratic and Republican legislative leaders. While several lawmakers on the Taxation Committee remain cool or hostile to the plan, the panel on Friday gave it a brief reprieve when it initiated a full cost analysis of the proposal by Maine Revenue Services.

The move followed prolonged and occasionally agonized deliberations by the committee, which considered killing the bill, L.D. 1496, or carrying it over until next session. Either outcome may yet await the bill, but lawmakers still want to see if elements of the plan can be incorporated into a solution to solve the state's next two-year budget.

The committee move was a small but significant step, said the bill's supporters.

"I really think this has legs," Rep. Gary Knight, R-Livermore Falls, the bill's sponsor and a member of the committee. "You heard them in there. If we don't do this, then what do we do? If we don't this now, then when do we do it?"

Knight and the bill's architect, Sen. Richard Woodbury, an independent from Yarmouth, told the committee that the bill wasn't initially intended to be a budget solution, but to modernize the state's tax code.

However, alternatives to Gov. Paul LePage's proposed $6.2 billion budget proposal has thus far proven elusive. Critics believe the governor's plan will lead to significant property tax increases because it suspends more than $200 million in municipal revenue sharing and cuts other tax relief schemes.

The Democratic majority has put forward proposals that either suspend the 2011 tax cuts the governor's budget is designed to protect or raise revenues through higher sales, lodging and meal taxes. However, Republicans, including Knight, have rejected those proposals because they aren't accompanied by additional tax cuts.

The coalition's plan slashes the state's income tax rate in half to 4 percent and increases the homestead exemption from $10,000 to $50,000 for property tax relief. The cuts are paid for by increased sales taxes and broadening the sales base through the elimination of exemptions, such as groceries and services.

The plan has made enemies by proposing to tax a host of services currently exempt and raising excise taxes on beer, wine and tobacco products.

It also appeared that the plan would tax heating oil and other home heating products. However, Woodbury and Knight said Friday that those exemptions were no longer targeted.

The proposal remains controversial because of its scope and unknown consequences. Nonetheless, most lawmakers on the Taxation Committee were unwilling to do away with it on Friday.

"If not this, then what other plan do we have?" asked Rep. Donald G. Marean, R-Hollis.

"I don't want to let go of this, not this session," said Rep. Joseph Brooks, an independent from Winterport.

Brooks, who has served three previous terms in the Legislature, said the tax reform proposal was the first one he's seen that has the potential for "major change."

The scope and timing of the proposal worried others.

"I don't think this bill is ready for prime time," said Sen. Doug Thomas, R-Ripley, who was ready to kill the bill on Friday.

The bill's supporters unveiled Friday a potential phased-in implementation of the plan. It included the proposed property tax exemption going into effect July 1, along with the restoration of municipal revenue sharing. A 1 percent increase in sales tax and the meals tax would also go into effect July 1, along with a 10 percent lodging tax (up from 7 percent) and excise tax increases on beer, wine and tobacco.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)