Tuesday, May 21, 2013
AUBURN - Surrounded by towering piles of electronic equipment, a half-dozen workers at eWaste Recycling Solutions spend their days prying apart old TV sets and computer monitors.
Rick Dumas, CEO of eWaste Recycling Solutions, LLC, in Auburn, points out all of the old TV sets, computer monitors and other electronic devices that await dismantling for recycling.
John Ewing/Staff Photographer
Christopher Pagon of Auburn dismantles an old television at eWaste Recycling Solutions. Maine’s electronic waste law has saved municipal taxpayers about $7 million in disposal costs.
John Ewing/Staff Photographer
It takes about three minutes to separate glass, plastic, metals and cathode ray tubes, which may contain lead and other toxic substances. Later, the manufacturers of the products will receive a bill for the work, which, in the case of Sony Electronics Inc., is 36 cents a pound.
"Before, the cost was borne by municipalities, or the consumer paid a tipping fee at the recycling center," said Rick Dumas, chief executive officer of eWaste, which employs 15 to 25 workers a year.
Dumas and his employees are among the beneficiaries of Maine's seven-year-old electronic waste law, which was designed to prevent electronic equipment from filling up landfills and releasing toxic substances into the environment.
The law is also one of the environmental measures that may be subject to a repeal effort by Gov. Paul LePage, who is looking to slash environmental regulations that, in his view, get in the way of a friendly business climate, job creation and an improved economy.
In his six-page, 63-point list of ideas for regulatory reforms, LePage proposed reviewing "all consumer products recycling and 'take-back' statutes and revise as necessary to develop a policy that ensures that manufacturers do not have to pay to recycle their consumer products and that these standards do not exceed those set in federal law."
LePage was referring to the state's so-called product stewardship statute, including the electronic waste law, which requires manufacturers of certain products to pick up the costs of recycling them.
Maine was the second state in the nation, following California, to adopt an electronic waste law in 2004. Today, there are 24 states with similar laws, but no federal law exists.
In Maine, manufacturers must pay for the cost of recycling television sets, computer monitors, desktop printers, laptop computers, portable DVD players, game consoles and digital picture frames, which are more costly to recycle than other electronics.
Each manufacturer is responsible for paying companies like eWaste Recycling Solutions for the costs of disposing of their share of the electronics. Manufacturers must pay a $3,000 annual registration fee, and those that don't participate may not sell their products in Maine. The fees that eWaste Recycling charges manufacturers are approved by the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Cities and towns are required to collect the equipment. Some communities do so at transfer stations, while others organize collection days, sometimes in concert with other communities.
Just how abolishing the electronic waste law would improve the state's economy or create jobs is unclear.
The electronic waste law spawned at least one company, eWaste in Auburn. It, along with Universal Recycling Technologies in Dover, N.H., which also employs Mainers, handles more than 90 percent of the state's electronic waste, said Dumas, the eWaste CEO.
No specific answers are yet available from the LePage administration. Dan Demerritt, LePage's spokesman, said the proposals are in their early stages and details are still forthcoming.
But, Demerritt said, it is the administration's view that the electronic waste and other product stewardship laws are bad for business and consumers.
The fees charged to manufacturers, for example, are typically passed on to customers in the form of higher prices.
"Maine's specific take-back rules force manufacturers and retailers who want to operate here to create costly recycling systems that do not exist in other states. For consumers, it means higher prices and fewer choices," Demerritt said.
(Continued on page 2)
click image to enlarge