June 16, 2012

In New England, the fishing stinks

‘We’re limping along’ says a Portland Fish Exchange official as scientists and fishermen struggle to get a handle on the health of Gulf of Maine species.

By Colin Woodard cwoodard@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

PORTLAND - It's a weekday morning, and the cavernous refrigerated hall of the Portland Fish Exchange -- the country's oldest wholesale fresh-fish auction -- is at a 10th of capacity.

20120615_Fish
click image to enlarge

Rebecca Roy prepares monkfish for sale at Browne Trading Co. in Portland on Friday. Populations of cod and haddock in the Gulf of Maine are at such low levels that regulators intend to add them to a list of damaged stocks.

Photos by Gordon Chibroski/Staff Photographer

20120615_Fish
click image to enlarge

A lobster boat heads out past fishing boats at the Portland Fish Pier on Friday. Maine’s groundfishing fleet has dwindled dramatically in recent years, with lobster boats replacing trawlers, gillnetters and other vessels in many ports.

A dozen vessels -- most of them small boats -- have discharged their catch. There are 100 ice-filled plastic totes of pollock at the back of the hall, and smaller numbers holding cod, hake, sole and other bottom-dwelling "groundfish." Eight swordfish -- silver torpedoes weighing nearly 200 pounds apiece -- have come in on the Safe Haven, a 40-foot boat out of Harpswell.

It's not a bad day, given the state of the Gulf of Maine's fisheries, but all told there are just 25,000 pounds of product on the floor. Bert Jongerden, the exchange's general manager, estimates that the publicly owned facility is on target for 5 million to 6 million pounds in 2012, ahead of the record low of 3.8 million pounds in 2010, but a fraction of the 20 million pounds it took in annually in the 1990s.

"We're limping along, but you can't plan adequately because the science is so speculative," Jongerden said, alluding to the federal fisheries service's recent radical downward revisions of the health of New England's cod populations. "No one has any faith in the science anymore."

"Everyone's trying hard to stay in business," he said of the fishermen who still land their fish in Maine. "They've got so much capital investment in this they can't just bail on it, so they hope the government can get the science straightened out."

Last month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service released its annual report on the status of the nation's fisheries.

The report, released May 15, indicated that management is working and that fish stocks are, in fact, improving.

According to the report, six once-threatened fish populations had been rehabilitated to healthy levels over the previous year, from Bering Sea snow crab to summer flounder on the mid-Atlantic coast.

Over the past 11 years, 27 damaged stocks have been declared rebuilt, leaving just 45 to be restored out of the 219 that the agency tracks.

Unfortunately, 13 of them are in New England, including many of those that once supported Maine's fishing communities.

The Gulf of Maine cod population remains at 58 percent of what managers consider a healthy level. Georges Bank cod is at 12 percent, and the region's Atlantic halibut is at just 3 percent.

When the next report comes out, Gulf of Maine cod and haddock will be added to the list of damaged stocks.

Maine's fishing fleet has dwindled to a shadow of its former self, with lobster boats replacing trawlers, gillnetters and other vessels in many ports. Many groundfishing vessels have moved from Portland to Massachusetts ports to save on fuel and earn extra income landing lobsters that wind up in their nets -- such bycatch may not be sold in Maine.

"The U.S. has among the strongest fishery management regimes in the world, and I very much feel that it's working," said John Sackton, publisher of Seafood.com in Lexington, Mass. "New England is the one area that's problematic. We're the problem child."

One reason is that many of New England's important commercial fish stocks have been exploited for a very long time and were more severely damaged.

"In the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, you have these huge-volume fisheries," said Maggie Mooney-Seus, a Gloucester, Mass.-based spokeswoman for NOAA Fisheries. "We had these things here in New England, too, but it was 300 years ago."

"In New England, we are probably dealing with a marine environment that has been highly disturbed from a fishing standpoint for centuries in regards to groundfish," said Peter Shelley, senior counsel of the Conservation Law Foundation, an organization whose 1991 lawsuit forced the federal government to take measures to stop overfishing and rebuild depleted stocks.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)