Wednesday, April 23, 2014
By Colin Woodard email@example.com
Full-time virtual schools -- which are coming to Maine and are the subject of a Maine Sunday Telegram investigation -- have a dubious track record.
WHAT ARE VIRTUAL SCHOOLS?
Originally conceived as a way to educate homeschoolers, full-time virtual charter schools have recently emerged as an alternative to public schools for a wide range of students, from bored overachievers to victims of bullying.
The virtual schools are paid for by taxpayers, but the students learn largely from home, with lessons delivered online from teachers tens, hundreds or even thousands of miles away. There is no schoolhouse, playground, gymnasium or lunch hall, although under some models students will occasionally meet for face-time sessions with each other and an educator.
In lower grades – virtual schools start at kindergarten – the programs typically rely on parents who act as “learning coaches,” following instructions that appear on their child’s computer. Older students do most of the work online themselves.
Teachers monitor and grade students remotely. They answer questions online or by telephone. Major national online teaching companies such as K12 Inc. have teacher-student ratios as high as 60 to 1.
– Colin Woodard
• ADDITIONAL READING
U.S. Dept. of Education 2009 study comparing virtual and conventional
Three university studies on virtual schools: Western Michigan University/NEPC
2011 CREDO (Stanford) study on Pennsylvania charter schools
A study released in July by researchers at Western Michigan University found that only 27.7 percent of the full-time virtual schools run by the nation's largest online education company, K12 Inc., met federally mandated Adequate Yearly Progress goals, compared to 52 percent of public schools.
Students at its schools scored lower in both reading and math and had a graduation rate of only 49 percent, compared to a 79 percent average among comparable students at public schools in the 24 states where the virtual schools are located.
"Across a wide variety of school measures they do very poorly, even though their demographics looked to us like suburban schools," says the study's lead author, Gary Miron, who is also a fellow at the National Education Policy Center. "We didn't see high poverty or a lot of (English as a Second Language) students."
Proponents of the schools -- including Maine education commissioner Stephen Bowen -- often quote a 2009 U.S. Department of Education study that found programs that blended online and face-to-face programs fared better than conventional learning. They do not mention that the report found this effect only "for undergraduate and older students, not elementary or secondary learners" and that it concluded that there was currently no "scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these emerging alternatives to face-to-face instruction."
In Pennsylvania, where some 30,000 students are enrolled in virtual schools at an average cost of $10,000 per student, pupils scored 13 percent worse in reading and 24 percent worse in math than students at ordinary public schools, according to a 2011 study by Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes. The researchers broke out the data for separate student groups -- those poor enough to qualify for free or reduced lunch, those still learning to speak English, grade repeaters, blacks and Hispanics -- and compared them to their counterparts at ordinary charter schools. "In every subgroup with significant effects," they reported, "cyber charter performance is lower than the brick-and-mortar performance."
The Stanford study may have helped prompt The New York Times to conduct an investigation of K12 Inc.'s virtual charter schools later that year, which concluded that the company "tries to squeeze profits from public school dollars by raising enrollment, increasing teacher workload and lowering standards."
At the K12-managed Agora Cyber Charter School in Pennsylvania -- which reportedly generated $72 million in revenues -- the Times found 60 percent of students were behind grade level in math, nearly 50 percent in reading and a third were not graduating on time: "Hundreds of children, from kindergartners to seniors, withdraw within months after they enroll."
The company spent $681,000 lobbying in the state between 2007 and the end of last year.
In Idaho, K12 donated $44,000 to the re-election of the state's top education official, Tom Luna, who pushed through requirements that students take online classes to graduate, according to an investigation by The Idaho Statesman. Another Idaho paper, The Times-News, found that while state law only allowed taxpayer funds to go to schools operated by nonprofits, the state's largest virtual school diverted 70 percent of the $9 million it had received from the state to its contractor, K12; a smaller virtual school sent 85 percent of its $829,000 allocation to its for-profit provider, Connections Education of Baltimore, the country's second-largest online education provider.
"K12 actually gets paid transportation costs in Idaho because they argue that since they bring the school to the children they should be paid the same as (ordinary) schools," says former Republican state Sen. Gary Schroeder of Moscow, who chaired Idaho's education committee for 18 years and sponsored that state's 2004 charter school law. "Virtual charter schools are organized for the most part by money, and the decision-making process in your state will be influenced heavily by education management organizations like K12."
(Continued on page 2)