November 26, 2012

Turbine tax credit, jobs at risk

Reforms in Washington could erase a break that has fueled wind farm projects in Maine.

By Kevin Miller
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - The tax reform momentum that seems to be building in Congress may imperil tax credit programs that have had major impacts in Maine, including wind power investments and economic development projects in rural or low-income areas.

Today's poll: Wind power

Do you favor federal tax credits for wind power investments?



View Results

click image to enlarge

File photo/The Associated Press

Related headlines

The credit for electricity produced at wind farms, as well as the New Markets Tax Credit program, are both due to expire Dec. 31. In Maine, wind farms have supported hundreds of construction jobs on projects that are generating 400 megawatts of electricity -- with 1,000 more megawatts on the drawing boards. The New Markets program has funneled $221 million into development projects, from the Millinocket woods to the Portland waterfront.

But with the congressional clock ticking down to the so-called fiscal cliff, this could be the year that Congress opts not to renew some policies that skeptics view as tax carve-outs for special interests.

"It appeared to me that there is less interest in extending the whole package this year," said Will McBride, chief economist at The Tax Foundation.

Many of the "tax extenders" -- so called because they were supposed to be temporary programs and must be renewed -- are not officially part of the negotiations over avoiding the fiscal cliff, a combination of deep spending cuts and tax increases scheduled to kick in Jan. 1.

But Congress is setting aside the credits, deductions and other tax breaks until after those much bigger negotiations. That decision is creating uncertainty among some Maine businesses that take advantage of the tax breaks.

The 50-plus items on the list of tax extenders run the gamut from items that benefit a relatively small number of individuals and businesses -- such as tax credits for purchasing plug-in hybrids and breaks for movie or television products -- to tax breaks enjoyed by tens of millions of families.

Among the latter is the Alternative Minimum Tax, or AMT, a major policy that -- if left unchanged -- would result in substantial tax increases for millions of Americans. While the AMT is likely to be dealt with during the bigger fiscal cliff discussions, most items on the list are in limbo.

Wind energy companies in Maine and across the nation currently can claim a tax credit of 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity produced at qualified facilities. Supporters of the program say it is critical to helping expand the nation's renewable-energy sector -- a fast-growing part of the U.S. economy -- and to diversifying the country's energy sources. Critics, however, see the credits as an unfair subsidy for a higher-cost energy source.

The tax credit enjoys strong support among both Democratic and Republican lawmakers from major wind-energy states in the West and Midwest, as well as among Maine's delegation. But opponents hope the debate over the fiscal cliff and concerns about the federal debt could help them kill off the tax credits this year.

Benjamin Cole, spokesman for the free-market group American Energy Alliance, said wind power and the wind production tax credits fail measurements for affordability, reliability and fiscal responsibility. Cole, whose organization has ties to conservative groups, asked if an extension "is a responsible thing to be doing, given our financial condition?"

But Jeremy Payne, executive director of the Maine Renewable Energy Association, said allowing the tax credit to end would likely result in "a significant slowdown" in the development of wind projects. That would hurt a sector of the Maine economy that has seen more than $1 billion in investment in recent years, Payne said.

"It's all of those jobs," Payne said. "Reed & Reed, Cianbro, those companies have put hundreds and hundreds of people to work at a time when governments are stepping away from infrastructure investments, such as on roads and bridges."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)

Today's poll: Wind power

Do you favor federal tax credits for wind power investments?



View Results