Saturday, March 8, 2014
Two environmental groups are pressing state utility regulators and the University of Maine to release a controversial proposal for a demonstration offshore wind power project – a document the university has declined to make public.
In this May 2013 file photo, a data-collection buoy that was deployed in the Gulf of Maine in June, which can track wind speeds overhead. Two environmental groups are pressing state utility regulators and the University of Maine to release a controversial proposal for a demonstration offshore wind power project – a document the university has declined to make public. (AP Photo/University of Maine)
In a letter sent Monday to the Public Utilities Commission, Environment Northeast and the Conservation Law Foundation said the public has a right to know if the project could cost less and have greater economic benefits than a previously-approved offshore wind proposal from the Norwegian energy company Statoil. The groups urged the PUC to make the UMaine plan public now and to decide its merits by Dec. 31.
The project is being developed through a partnership between the university and several businesses, under the name Maine Aqua Ventus I, GP, LLC.
"The longer it takes the commission to reach its decision, the greater the risk of disrupting an important economic opportunity for Maine's clean energy future and risking its business reputation," wrote Beth Nagusky, Environment Northeast's Maine director, and Sean Mahoney, vice president for the Conservation Law Foundation.
In a related action, Mahoney's group filed a Freedom of Access Act request with UMaine and the PUC, in an effort to see the documents and gain a fuller understanding of how the proposal evolved.
The Portland Press Herald has also filed Freedom of Access Act requests for the documents.
The Maine attorney for Statoil, Patrick Scully, has also written a letter to the agency asking it to provide access to the Maine Aqua Ventus proposal. Scully did not submit his request under the Freedom of Access Act. However, he argued that, as the only developer with an approved contract for offshore wind with the PUC, Statoil should be able to see the proposal, subject to appropriate confidentiality rules.
Taken together, the steps seem designed to put pressure on the PUC and university partnership to quickly release at least some of the information on its offshore wind proposal.
Harry Lanphear, a spokesman for the PUC, said the agency had put the letters on its website and would seek comments from formal parties to the case before deciding how to respond.
COMPETITION OR CONFIDENTIAL?
The UMaine partnership's lawyer, Tony Buxton, said the proposal was filed as a confidential document in keeping with the practices of all other PUC bidders, including Statoil, and would be made public if and when a power contract is awarded by the PUC.
Buxton pointed out that the university project is in competition for federal energy funds with six national deep water wind proposals, including Statoil's project, and releasing data now would give the others an unfair advantage.
"That is not in the interest of (Maine Aqua Ventus), the state of Maine or the state and federal effort to successfully develop offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine," Buxton said.
On Sept. 1, the Maine Aqua Ventus business partnership submitted a highly anticipated proposal for a demonstration offshore wind power project to the PUC. Among other things, the proposal estimates what consumers can expect to pay for wind energy generated off the Maine coast -- at least in its developmental stages.
But UMaine made the unusual move of keeping the entire 100-page document from public view. That makes it impossible to get a sense of the overall economic potential of a venture meant to advance Maine's standing as a center of research and construction in deep water ocean energy.
The lack of transparency was immediately criticized by the Maine Renewable Energy Association and business interests that had been supporting the Statoil project, known as Hywind Maine.
UMaine's proposal, like the previous bid from Statoil, will likely offer power at costs considerably above what consumers are now paying for electricity generated from burning natural gas.
(Continued on page 2)