February 18

Maine Voices: Coach's resignation more questionable than photo that led to flap

The man meant for only his girlfriend to see the Facebook image, and he posed no threat to anyone. So what was the problem?

By JONATHAN DAVID FARLEY

FACEBOOK
click image to enlarge

The coach who briefly posted a nude photo of himself on Facebook should not have faced calls for his resignation, a UMaine professor says, since the man’s actions took place outside of school.

2006 File Photo/The Associated Press

ORONO - What disturbs me about the Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School coach who recently resigned after posting a nude photo of himself on Facebook is not the photo.

I am sure that the photo would disturb me if I looked at it, but, since I teach a class at the University of Maine called Computers, Ethics and Society, it's the clarion call for the coach's resignation that is most disturbing. This is wrong for four reasons:

First, we should in general adhere to the principle, "No harm, no foul."

The coach's excuse -- that he didn't understand Facebook's new privacy settings and intended for only his girlfriend to see the photo -- is practically irrefutable.

No one denies that the photo was up for only 10 minutes. Apparently, a parent found it, probably because friends get to see whatever friends do on Facebook, a feature that has frustrated many. 

While it is unclear why an adult would want to "friend" students on Facebook, the simple fact is that Robin Williams' endearing character in "Dead Poets Society" would, if he were living today, do just that.

Second, a football coach should not be fired for mishandling Facebook outside of school.

Facebook has nothing to do with the coach's job. A coach should resign only when he misbehaves on the job. He should be able to post whatever he wants, subject to the law. 

After all, he could just as easily fall flat on his face stumbling out of a bar at 2 a.m. on a Saturday, but we understand that that is his own business; only entering the school drunk is the school's business.

Third, neither the coach nor his photo -- which no student would have seen, had a parent not made a big deal about it -- poses a threat to anyone. He was a coach of a football team, not a girls' gymnastics team. 

Indeed, his explanation of the incident confirms that he's not likely to want to "horse around" with the players in the shower, like the accused Penn State assistant coach. And, frankly, any high school football player worth his salt could and would beat the living daylights out of the coach if he tried.

In America, there is a trend that everyone is treated as a serial killer until proven otherwise. And, just like Pavlov's dogs, we begin to brutalize each other without having good reason to. 

For example, in Maine, prospective teachers must be fingerprinted, something formerly reserved only for people under arrest. But this policy makes no sense, unless a prospective teacher was also once a careless cat burglar. You usually don't leave fingerprints when you molest someone.

Moreover, American school systems are quite inconsistent in this regard.

For instance, New York City, one of the biggest school districts in the country, has hired a self-professed drug dealer, thief and virtual-attempted murderer at a salary of between $170,000 and $195,000. Their theory, I assume, is that one can be an ex-cat burglar and a great chemistry teacher. 

Fourth, and finally, I can't figure Facebook out, either, and I'm a professor of computing.

The site's privacy controls change all the time and really are quite complicated. I have written computer programs since I was 9, and I cannot figure out how to put a "wall" photo in the strip at the top of the screen without re-posting it. 

I am sure there are photos of me on Facebook that the general public could see without my meaning for them to. Of course, mine are all kid-friendly -- although there is that photo of a 19-year-old seemingly passed out on my shoulder in a club in Austria, which I found on her Facebook page. But I think she was just tired.

 In conclusion, the government must pass laws prohibiting employers from using social networking websites in employment decisions. While it is impossible for such a law to have teeth, we must establish the ethic in this society that, even though cameras watch us constantly, we retain the freedom to do as we will -- subject, of course, to the terms and conditions of the social contract -- on our own time.

Jonathan David Farley is a professor of computing and information science at the University of Maine.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Most...