Tuesday, March 11, 2014
I was born and raised in the state of Maine. My dad bought me my first rifle when I was in the eighth grade and taught me how to use it.
Wayne LaPierre, National Rifle Association CEO, holds a news conference Dec. 21 in response to the school shooting in Newtown, Conn. “Rifles configured to fire hundreds of bullets in less than a minute” don’t belong in the hands of private citizens, readers say.
2012 File Photo/The Associated Press
I understand the Second Amendment and the right of Americans to bear arms. But what I don't understand is why private citizens need to own semiautomatic military assault rifles configured to fire hundreds of bullets in less than a minute.
The gunman in Newtown had a semiautomatic assault rifle that sprayed hundreds of bullets into that classroom of 6-year-olds and 7-year-olds, hitting each multiple times.
In 1994, the Clinton administration outlawed all semiautomatic assault weapons in America and limited gun clips to 10 bullets. In 2004, Congress allowed that law to expire.
At least three attempts have been made to bring that law back, but conservative members of Congress blocked those attempts each time. I expect those same members of Congress will stand with the gun lobbyists and the National Rifle Association once again to fight any new gun control initiative.
As the son of a police officer, I support tougher laws for guns that have no place in society. These guns put our first responders and our citizens at much greater risk, unnecessary risk.
Gun control laws are not perfect and will not stop all the killing of innocent people by those who should not have access to guns. But why make it so easy to kill so many so quickly?
Let your state and federal legislators know that you support stronger gun control laws for assault weapons. Pay attention to how they're voting on this important issue. They won't need to be reminded that we have another election coming up in 2014.
Born and bred Mainers, my grandfathers and my father were hunters. While I don't hunt, I know many people who do and I respect their choice. But hunting doesn't require high-powered, high-capacity military weapons designed to kill humans.
American children ages 5 to 14 are 13 times more likely to be killed by a gun than children in all other industrialized nations, according to David Hemenway of Harvard. Why? Because we have safety regulations for just about everything, but very few governing the sales and use of guns.
You can buy an assault weapon at a gun show without a background check, then drive over to Walmart to stock up on ammunition, or order it online. An increasing number of states have passed laws allowing people to carry their guns just about anywhere.
Schools are the only safe havens in the lives of many children. Some have suggested that educators should be armed. I can't imagine that any educators I've ever known would want a gun in their classroom or office.
Would we revise teacher education programs to add marksmanship to the curriculum? Perhaps some would opt to take an exam for a sniper certificate. But this would not make us safer.
Having guns in school would create a culture of fear, and increase opportunities for students to gain access to weapons that could lead to more school shootings.
Easy access to guns and the rampant violence that distinguishes the United States from other industrialized democracies do not make us freer. There is no simple solution to the level of violence in our nation.
We can start by treating this as a public health and safety issue, one that needs our urgent attention and commitment to preventing any more children, or adults, from being gunned down.
(Continued on page 2)