Wednesday, December 11, 2013
By John Richardson email@example.com
Maine voters are frustrated and skeptical about the state's public assistance programs, and Republican gubernatorial candidate Paul LePage has tapped into that anger far more than his rivals, according to a poll by MaineToday Media.
More than half of Maine voters -- 56 percent -- said they agree that Maine's poor have become too dependent on government assistance programs. One in five voters said they believe more than half of welfare recipients are "gaming the system."
The Maine Poll was conducted last Sunday and Monday for MaineToday Media by the Portland research firm Critical Insights.
The frustration with public assistance coincides with record unemployment and rising demand for Maine's network of safety-net programs, some of which have record enrollments. It also measures Mainers' attitudes during a contentious gubernatorial election campaign dominated by insecurity about the economy and the state budget.
Democratic Gov. John Baldacci defended the state's assistance programs, but he said he was not surprised by the anger.
"Unfortunately, in these tough times, in people's anger about the big investment bankers getting (bailouts), it appears there are some (recipients) who people feel are getting assistance and shouldn't, and that it's those who are working hard and playing by the rules who are taking it by the neck," Baldacci said.
He compared the mood now to the one in the mid-1990s, when he was in Congress voting for welfare reform.
Sixty-three percent of poll respondents said the state does not do enough to encourage and help recipients find work. Twenty percent said they believe the state is doing enough.
Despite the frustration, however, Mainers continue to support the need to have the programs.
Fifty-five percent said they agree that Maine has a responsibility to provide assistance for food and housing when people are in need. Fifteen percent disagreed, either somewhat or completely.
"It is kind of a consistent inconsistency that we see," said Luisa Deprez, a sociology professor at the University of Southern Maine who has studied Maine assistance programs. "People basically say this is an important role of government" even while they criticize the people who rely on it.
She said the same percentage of people -- about 10 percent -- cheat any system, whether it's public assistance, school or business. "What we do is we take the smallest unit and generalize it," she said.
Deprez also said the poll reflects the struggle faced by many Mainers today and a fear, perhaps subconscious, that they could soon be in need themselves.
"There is a profound sense of vulnerability," she said. "When the economy is doing well, we have a much more collective spirit."
Frustration with public assistance programs clearly appears to be fueling or reinforcing support for LePage.
LePage has made welfare reform a central theme of his campaign and pledged to impose a five-year time limit for families receiving cash benefits, among other things. His story of poverty as a child and criticism of the welfare system as "economic slavery" have helped connect with voter sentiment, said Michael Franz, associate professor of government at Bowdoin College.
"I think it's his personal story, which lends some authenticity to his arguments. It's the fact that he hasn't been in Augusta," Franz said.
When asked which of the three leading candidates for governor would be the most effective at managing the state's welfare programs, 32 percent of respondents said LePage would be. Twenty-two percent said Democrat Libby Mitchell, and 13 percent said independent Eliot Cutler.
Those voters who said they support LePage were far more likely to find fault with the programs.
Less than half of Mitchell and Cutler supporters agreed that poor Mainers are too dependent on the programs, for example. About three-quarters of LePage supporters -- 74 percent -- agreed.
(Continued on page 2)