November 10, 2010

Is winning an election enough?

By Tom Bell
Staff Writer

The election of Paul LePage with 38 percent of the vote means Maine's next governor won't take office with the support of the majority of voters -- a situation that has occurred in six of the last seven gubernatorial elections.


YEAR   VICTOR                        WINNING PERCENTAGE

2010     Paul LePage                 38 percent in a field of five

2006     John Baldacci               39 percent in a field of five

2002     John Baldacci               48 percent in a field of four

1998     Angus King                   59 percent in a field of five

1994     Angus King                   35 percent in a field of five

1990     John McKernan            47 percent in a field of three

1986     John McKernan            49 percent in a field of three

In the last 28 years, only Angus King captured a majority, in 1998.

Some people, including Eliot Cutler, an independent who finished second last week in the five-way gubernatorial race, say it's time to reform the system so Maine's next governor can better represent the consensus of voters.

Cutler said the state should consider runoff elections, to be held if no candidate wins a majority in the general election. Two states, Georgia and Louisiana, hold runoff elections for governor. And last week, California voters approved runoff elections for governor starting in 2014.

Adding a state election would be expensive. It would cost the state about $200,000 to print and distribute the ballots, and it would cost Maine's 503 municipalities several million dollars, said Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap.

That's why there is more interest in Maine in holding instant runoff elections. An instant runoff would produce a majority winner and save money by requiring only one election, Dunlap said.

Proponents of that idea point to Portland, where voters last week approved a system known as ranked choice voting for electing the city's mayor.

The system is essentially a series of runoff elections, tallied in rounds. A winner is declared when one candidate gets the majority of votes in a round.

The League of Young Voters has been pushing the idea, and the League of Women Voters of Maine is studying whether to endorse it.

State Rep. Diane Russell, D-Portland, who has tried and failed to get the Legislature to fund a pilot project, said she plans to submit a bill again on ranked choice voting.

She said the system would produce winners with majority support while changing the tenor of campaigns.

She said candidates would avoid negative campaigning because they would be hunting for second- and third-place votes in addition to first-place votes.

In this year's governor's race, Democrat Libby Mitchell, who came in a distant third, never would have attacked Cutler in political ads, and Democrats wouldn't have distributed mailers accusing Cutler of helping corporations export jobs to China, Russell said.

"They would have said (to voters), 'We respect that you support Eliot Cutler, but we are asking that Libby be your second choice,'" Russell said.

With ranked choice voting, Cutler most likely would have won the election because he was the most popular second choice of Mitchell voters, said Scott Ruffner, a real estate broker in Bangor who serves on the platform committee of the Maine Democratic Party.

To illustrate how ranked choice voting works, Ruffner pointed to the five-way gubernatorial race.

The first round would be just like last week's election, with LePage getting 38 percent, Cutler 37 percent, Mitchell 19 percent, independent Shawn Moody 5 percent and independent Kevin Scott 1 percent.

In the second round, Scott would be eliminated. The remaining candidates would get the second-choice votes cast for them on Scott's ballots.

In the third round, Moody would be eliminated, and the second-choice votes on his ballots would be redistributed. In the fourth round, Mitchell would be eliminated, and the second-choice votes on her ballots would be redistributed.

At that point, Cutler would have been the winner, Ruffner said, because Cutler, a moderate who was supported more by Democrats than Republicans, would have had a larger share of Mitchell's second-choice votes than LePage.

Rep. Joan Nass, R-Acton, who served on the Legislature's Legal and Veterans Affairs Committee when Russell submitted her bill two years ago, said nobody on the committee supported it.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)