I read with disappointment Greg Kesich’s column on the proposed St. Lawrence Arts Center addition (“Stagnation a steep price to pay for free and easy parking,” Feb. 12).

I regularly read his columns and often find myself in agreement with his views, but he badly missed the boat in this one. He resorted to a time-honored rhetorical device: setting up a false choice to drive you in the direction he wants. We do not have a choice of stagnation on Munjoy Hill or St.Lawrence addition. As Mr. Kesich should be aware, Munjoy Hill is arguably the most vibrant neighborhood in Portland, enjoying a resurgence unmatched anywhere else in the city. No stagnation here.

The issue is whether or not it is appropriate to put a regional performing arts center in the middle of a residential district. The proposed St. Lawrence addition would result in a venue with the capacity for 721 people, 485 of whom could be in attendance at any one event.

This compares to the current capacity of 110. To put this in perspective, the proposed facility would, for a single event, have nearly twice as many people as a full house at Portland Stage and nearly 2½ times as a full house at One Longfellow Square.

And make no mistake, it is in a residential district. That is the only reason the Planning Board gets to decide on the fate of this project.

There are many other issues to take up in Mr. Kesich’s column. I will leave them for others.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.