Once again, some among us are falsely interpreting the intent of the Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of speech.

The Supreme Court has already ruled that falsely yelling “Fire!” in a crowded place is not protected. So it’s obvious that constitutional scholars using common sense can interpret the intended limits of acceptable, responsible and democratic freedom of speech, ensuring the safety and well-being of all.

The premise that just one tiny pushback to one person’s free speech will lead to an autocratic state is bogus. Without limits to untruthful, unscientific and noninclusive lies, a democratic nation plunges toward disaster. To begin: Define ethics parameters for all persons who are in elected office (local to national); all running for elected office, and radio, TV, phone and internet businesses.

This would not squelch free speech. It would demand that any person or business would have to support any statement with verifiable evidence at the time of presentation. This would allow another to seek legal recourse if misinformation is intentionally spoken or allowed that could result in the loss of safety or well-being of others. It would encourage free speech from real Americans and guard against those who spew words without any regard of truth. If we are to remain free, stop the few who are stealing our freedoms using words of hate, division and lies.

Unless you choose to talk to yourself, your speech must always safeguard the security and all the constitutional rights of others.

Jim Storer
Westbrook

Copy the Story Link