Why is the demolition of a property protected by Portland’s historic preservation ordinance even being considered?
Are all our civic leaders unfamiliar with our city’s history, and too young to remember the demolition of Portland’s beautiful Union Station in 1961?
The former Children’s Museum, at 142 Free St., meets four of the six criteria for protection, when only meeting one criterion is all that is required. What is the point of having a historic preservation ordinance if it can be cast aside when convenient?
Must we destroy another of our city’s historic buildings before we wake up and realize that we are destroying our city?
Deborah Jordan
Peaks Island
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.