Barring a blocking by Congress, it seems that we will end up with the courts deciding whether President Trump’s national emergency declaration will hold.
Some are saying that presidents have very wide discretion on this, since there are no specific criteria that must be met, but how wide is that discretion?
It can’t be unlimited, or a president could declare a national emergency if libraries were losing users and needed assistance (an education crisis), or too many people were having everyday colds and money needed to be shifted to pay for health services that Congress would not legislate for (health crisis). Or, in the case of Trump, that his properties nationwide were losing value and that hurt the nation’s business climate (economic crisis). So, such executive power cannot be unlimited.
So, what criteria should be used regarding national emergency declarations? Can general criteria be drawn, or must it be decided case by case? In, say, in the border situation, all relevant factors and circumstances must be evaluated – including many of the statements made by Trump himself.
Neil Wollman
Portland
Copy the Story LinkSend questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.