The debate about the New England Clean Energy Connect plan to build a transmission line across western Maine is a murky swirl of dialogue. The real debate is whether it is feasible to keep Maine’s beautiful and priceless western scenery while delivering this power. Yes, it is feasible.
Consider that delivering large amounts of power via subsurface cables is a well-established technology. Massive American cities distribute many gigawatts of power via cables in tunnels. Maine’s islands rarely have power plants on them, instead their power arrives via subsea cables. These systems today are reliable and efficient. So, why is this not Plan A? Recall that the revised current plan tunnels the power lines under the Kennebec River (this was a change forced by public outcry).
Furthermore, let’s save money and the environment by using about 150 miles of railroad right-of-way that already exists. Look at Maine DOT’s Maine Rail System 2016 map, and set the NECEC proposed route map next to it. There are eerie similarities. Even better, river crossings are already provided with the existing railroad infrastructure. By the way, would the railroads possibly be intrigued with having a clean power source alongside their tracks?
Let’s do it.
Lisa Miller
Scarborough
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.