April 12, 2013

The gun debate: Suburban growth alters political calculus

In traditionally gun-friendly states, the shift from rural to suburban forces politicians to recalibrate.

By PHILIP RUCKER and PAUL KANE The Washington Post

Pennsylvania, Georgia and Virginia have long been bastions of gun-rights supporters, with vast rural areas and strong hunting traditions. But in recent days, lawmakers from those states have demonstrated a new willingness to back stricter firearms regulations, setting the stage for what could be the first major gun-control legislation to pass Congress in two decades.

GUNS SUBURBS
click image to enlarge

Janelle Tupper places a cross, one of about 3,300 symbolic markers assembled Thursday on the National Mall in Washington to represent victims of gun violence that occurred after the December 2012 shootings in Newtown, Conn.

Washington Post photo by Matt McClain

Related headlines

The shift underscores a new reality of gun politics in America: The rapid growth of suburbs in historically gun-friendly states are forcing politicians to cater to the views of voters in subdivisions and cul-de-sacs rather than those in shrinking rural hamlets where gun ownership is more of a way of life.

In Pennsylvania, for example, all 14 Republicans representing the state in Congress are solidly pro-gun and have an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association. Yet the state's conservative senator is the co-architect of a new compromise to expand background checks for firearms purchases. And a handful of GOP House members from the state's suburban areas are poised to back the measure.

The central role played in recent days by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., has brought attention to how the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh suburbs have become the state's political centers of gravity. Similar shifts can be seen in other states with fast-growing suburbs, including Georgia and Virginia, as well as Arizona and Colorado.

The phenomenon will be on wider display next week, when the debate in Congress begins. The gun legislation cleared its first major hurdle on Thursday when the Senate voted 68 to 31 to proceed with debate. Sixteen Republicans joined 52 Democrats in supporting initial debate, overcoming the threat of a filibuster by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and some other Republicans.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., estimated his constituency is 65 percent suburban -- and those voters, he said, are looking for "very practical, middle-ground solutions" from their elected officials.

"There is a respect for the Second Amendment," Kaine said. "But we definitely understand, too, that there are balances." Suburbanites, he said, believe that gun rights should be "tempered by social responsibility."

Unlike every other debate that has unfolded recently in a bitterly divided Washington, the gun debate is much more about geography than party. The dividing lines are not between Democrats and Republicans, but between rural lawmakers and those who have to cater to urban and suburban constituencies.

This explains why Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the gun-control group financed by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a political independent, has been airing television ads in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Las Vegas and Ohio metropolitan areas such as Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati, sensing opportunities to sway Republican senators.

The rural-suburban divide was evident in the role played in recent weeks by Republican Sen. Tom Coburn, a gun-rights backer from Oklahoma. Democrats looking for a GOP partner to broker a bipartisan deal on background checks first turned to Coburn, a staunch conservative with a penchant to reach for compromise. Coburn spent weeks negotiating with Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. -- but the talks stalled as the Oklahoman faced intense lobbying pressure from gun advocates in his heavily rural state.

Democrats then turned to Toomey, whose future political survival depends largely on winning over suburban voters in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas.

The geographic divisions are playing out among Democrats, as well. Two of the Senate votes on Thursday against proceeding with debate on the gun control legislation came from Sens. Mark Begich of Alaska and Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Democrats whose home states remain largely rural.

In the end, the compromise plan on background checks drafted by Toomey, Manchin and Schumer fits views in the suburbs, where polls show voters to be mixed on gun control issues. The plan would expand background check requirements on gun purchases -- but, in not covering many sales between private individuals, the measure stops far short of the stricter controls sought by President Barack Obama and gun control advocates.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)