Monday, March 10, 2014
Arranged marriages rarely work, thus the case of Regional School Unit 5: Freeport, Durham and Pownal. Forced together by the previous governor with a promise of saving money and better programming for kids, nothing could be further from the truth.
Freeport Middle School students Kali Adams and Madison Burgess find fossils after sifting through a screen during a 2006 class. A reader says she backs the breakup of RSU 5, citing the “systematic watering-down of program offerings” under consolidation.
2006 File Photo/John Patriquin
My family and I moved to Freeport because of the close community and excellent education. Since the forming of RSU 5, we have witnessed class crowding and what seems to be a systematic watering-down of program offerings. Every time there is a budget vote, Freeport votes “yes” and Durham and Pownal vote “no.”
The school board’s mission is to advocate for students in providing the best education possible. This cannot be done when all our partners (and I use this term loosely) want to do is to to make cuts. Every cut that is made has significant impact for years to come on students and their future.
It is imperative that we provide students with the tools that they need in order to, not just survive, but to thrive in a global world and economy.
The value systems of these towns are simply not aligned; in the end, the old saying, “We didn’t have that when I was young and I did just fine,” doesn’t make sense because we live in a different world now.
Freeport needs to take back local control and what is rightfully theirs: to provide our kids with the education that we believe they deserve, which is based upon innovation, small classes, updated facilities and, most importantly, critical and progressive thinkers on the school board who are able to make and implement wise choices for our kids.
Arranged marriages are outdated, and so are our partners. Freeport needs to have the courage to move on.
Nemitz column’s assessment of Cohen’s role stirs debate
Seldom do I agree with Bill Nemitz’s columns, but I must commend him for his Dec. 6 column about the politics of the civic center (“In civic center smackdown, trust the trustees”).
The decision-making about whether to renegotiate with the Portland Pirates should be left entirely with the civic center’s board of trustees.
It is clear that board Chairman Neal Pratt is looking out for the taxpayers who voted for the renovations to the civic center. The Pirates’ owner is exceptionally greedy in his demands of the center.
I definitely believe that Jim Cohen, who is a lawyer for the Pirates and chairman of the board of directors of the Portland Regional Chamber, is totally out of line to request a meeting with the Pirates. There are many events and venues that can more profitably replace the Pirates at the civic center.
Thank you, Bill Nemitz, for revealing the politics that would have remained unknown without your column.
I read Bill Nemitz’s column regarding the ongoing dispute between the Cumberland County Civic Center trustees and the Portland Pirates and was dismayed by the characterization of former Portland Mayor Jim Cohen.
The column implies an improper relationship because Jim serves in a volunteer role as chairman of the Portland Regional Chamber while professionally as an attorney representing the Pirates.
I’ve known Jim for nearly two decades and know him to be a man of great integrity. I am proud to serve alongside him as volunteer vice chair of the chamber’s board.
During discussions of the issue, Jim has been careful to recuse himself from the chamber’s deliberation and decision-making. Portland is a small community and many of us – by necessity, it would seem – wear many hats.
(Continued on page 2)