Wednesday, December 4, 2013
(Continued from page 1)
I am responding to the Maine Sunday Telegram of Aug. 18 editorial by Rick Morgan, "Learning to love your smart meter."
I was one of those people at the Maine Public Utilities Commission hearing on Aug. 7, testifying on health effects of smart meters.
If these "much-maligned devices," as Mr. Morgan stated, make you sick with headaches and fatigue or worse (one woman testified she thought she was dying), doing your laundry at 2 a.m. to save 10 cents on electricity costs isn't very important.
No one was malicious, nor did anyone speak untruths. We were testifying under oath. We all had serous health concerns and it was an opportunity to let the PUC know the effects of smart meters, as that was the focus of the hearing. We were not making "noise" as Mr. Morgan stated.
Meter readers have lost their jobs. CMP is charging extra not to have a device on my home that I don't want, don't need and makes me sick. It's called extortion. Many of my family, neighbors and friends have been ill from smart meters. I will not learn to love my smart meter.
'Believing' article flawed because of the test group
While reacting to the "Believing makes it true" (Aug. 18) article. I had a thought. What if instead of Jesus, each student was asked to write his or her mother's name on a piece of paper before being asked to stamp on them. Or, what if Allah was the word, or Moses?
I can somewhat see the point if all in the group were of the same persuasion. The exercise was once done in a Catholic college. It was to stir up feelings and then discussion. But in the setting cited, a random and varied group, it lacked respect and sensitivity, two characteristics a college professor should have.
Does anyone living in this conflicted age think that "letters on a page" have no power, and that care should be taken in choosing them?
No feeding state's bears unless you want to kill one
I'm happy to be a member of the newly formed group Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting. Our goal is not to ban bear hunting. Rather, it is to end the inhumane and unsporting practices of bear hounding, trapping, and baiting.
Maybe baiting doesn't seem so bad. But I wonder how many people know that Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife warns the public not to feed bears -- but allows exceptions for people who want to hunt and kill them. What kind of sense does that make?
Whether you are baiting for viewing or hunting, it sets up the potential for bear-human conflict. Plus, a steady source of extra food can contribute to bear overpopulation and the problem of nuisance bears seeking food in people-populated areas.
I also wonder where the "sport" is in shooting a bear while it is eating from a pile of human food, such as old doughnuts, spoiled meat and leftover pizza.
I hope Mainers will talk about this issue and give serious consideration to our hunting practices. And I'd hate to think the restaurants and coffee shops I patronize are contributing leftovers to bait piles.
It's time to end bear baiting.
The world is a safer place because U.S. has the bomb
It has been 68 years since the mushroom cloud formed over the city of Hiroshima. The world is not running away from this devastating weapon because it the most ideal weapon man can make. It is small and it can cause massive damage.
That's why seven nations have this weapon. If the U.S. does not have nuclear weapons, the world will rush to make more of them and, in time, nuclear wars will spread.
No matter how much we talk of peace, it is not going change some nations' minds; they are going to nuke us as soon as they can.