Politics

January 17, 2013

Proposed cuts worry Maine Clean Election advocates

'Welfare to politicians' is not a priority for the governor, says his spokeswoman.

The Associated Press

AUGUSTA — Supporters of Maine's law allowing public financing of election campaigns are worried by a portion of Gov. Paul LePage's proposed budget, which they say would deprive legislative and gubernatorial candidates of funding for 2014.

click image to enlarge

Gov. Paul LePage's proposed budget seeks to cut $2 million in disbursements from the Maine Clean Election fund in each of the next two years, for a total of $4 million. (AP Photo/Joel Page)

Related headlines

The budget seeks to cut $2 million in disbursements from the Maine Clean Election fund in each of the next two years, for a total of $4 million.

"The governor's proposal to kill Clean Elections would ensure that big-money special interests dominate our elections in 2014," said Andrew Bossie, executive director of Maine Citizens for Clean Elections. "Maine citizens demanded Clean Elections to ensure that government is accountable to voters, not the highest bidding wealthy donors."

Funding for political campaigns was not a high priority for LePage in drafting a budget in a fiscally challenging environment, said his spokeswoman, Adrienne Bennett.

"This budget, we had to prioritize. Giving welfare to politicians came further down the list from protecting Maine's most vulnerable people," said Bennett, and it's a "false premise that these dollars take the politics out of" campaigns.

LePage, a Republican, ran for governor in 2010 with private funding.

Voters approved the Maine Clean Election Act in 1996, making Maine the first state to adopt public campaign financing. Under the law, legislative and gubernatorial candidates who qualify by collecting the required number of small donations receive public funds for their election campaigns.

The program has been highly popular with candidates from both parties since it was first used, in 2000. As many as 81 percent of legislative candidates have financed their campaigns with Clean Election funds in some years.

The percentage dipped from 77 percent in 2010 to 62 percent in the 2012 elections.

Independent, third-party organizations have spent heavily on behalf of some legislative candidates in recent elections.

The Clean Election Act used to provide matching funds for publicly funded candidates who were targeted by those third-party groups, but the U.S. Supreme Court struck down that provision in 2011.

The ruling in effect took away publicly funded candidates' ability to access extra cash when their privately funded opponents outspent them.

Bossie said his group will push for legislation this year to address that portion of the law. A similar attempt was rejected by the last Legislature.

"We should be fulfilling the will of Maine people by strengthening our campaign finance laws so voters, not out-of-state special interests, have a greater voice in Augusta," said Sen. Ed Youngblood, R-Brewer, sponsor of the bill to address matching funds.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Blogs

More PPH Blogs